Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to hit Syria with sanctions
Jerusalem Post ^ | 2/12/04

Posted on 02/12/2004 4:30:48 PM PST by areafiftyone

The US plans to impose sanctions on Syria in accordance with the Syria Accountability Act, US Secretary of State Colin Powell told a Senate panel on Thursday. During the hearing, Powell also placed the burden for moving peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on the Palestinians.

Asked whether the US intends to begin implementation of the Syria Accountability Act sometime in the near future, Powell told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, "Yes. We're examining now what sections of the act we want to use."

That the administration has been reviewing which sanctions might be imposed within the next few months has been known in Washington.

But it was the first time a senior US official stated publicly that sanctions would definitely be imposed.

The president has the ability to waive sanctions if he deems it in US national security interests.

The act, signed in December by President George W. Bush, directs the president to ban US sales of weaponry and dual-use items – items that could be used for civilian or military purpose – unless Syria abandons its support for terrorism, removes its troops from Lebanon, stops the flow of terrorists into Iraq, and abandons its pursuit of nonconventional weapons.

It also calls on the president to impose two or more sanctions from a list of six: an export ban; ban on US businesses operating in Syria; restrictions on Syrian diplomats in the US; exclusion of Syrian-owned aircraft from US airspace; a reduction of diplomatic contacts with Syria; or freezing of Syrian assets in the US.

Powell said during the hearing that Syria had not yet closed the offices of Palestinian terrorist groups or expelled Palestinian terrorist leaders from Damascus as the US has demanded.

He also said he could not confirm or deny whether a Syrian plane had brought back weapons for Hizbullah from Iran after an earthquake-relief mission there.

On the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Powell said that this week, through European intermediaries, he urged the Palestinian Authority leadership to "come forward with a security plan to start taking action against terrorists in a very significant and decisive way." He urged Israel not to enact a disengagement plan that would preclude long-term stability in the region.

"The Israelis are now making some unilateral moves. We don't want to see a solution that is so unilateral that it doesn't really provide the kind of stability that we're looking for. But the Palestinians must move, and we've made it clear to them," Powell said.

Powell said the US was "very closely" following Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's proposal to evacuate Jewish settlers from the Gaza Strip.

"And we've said to the Israelis, that's interesting, we want the settlements closed, we want to know exactly how... that's going to be done and where will those settlers go, and how does it affect settlement activity in the West Bank," Powell added.

In a radio interview Wednesday, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage said "the majority of the blame has to be on the Palestinians who have not completely and totally eschewed terrorism as an instrument of policy." Armitage called Israel's pronouncement that settlers would be evacuated from Gaza "a step in the right direction."

In his testimony, Powell also said the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is inspiring anti-American sentiment in the Middle East and affecting US reconstruction efforts in Iraq.

"We fully understand that this conflict between the Palestinians and the Israelis is the source of a great deal of the anti-American feelings that exist in that part of the world, and does affect what we're doing in Iraq, and that part of the world," he said.

Powell was attempting to reassure senators that resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a "matter of the utmost urgency" for the United States, even though he skipped over the issue in his opening remarks outlining foreign priorities for the coming year, and the president ignored the conflict totally in his State of the Union speech in January.

US envoys from the State Department and the White House National Security Council are due to travel to Israel next week.



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: sanctions; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: areafiftyone
US to hit Syria with sanctions

What caliber?

21 posted on 02/12/2004 7:41:36 PM PST by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
pakistan for five
n. korea toppled for six
china for seven

can I buy a vow from vanna now?
22 posted on 02/12/2004 8:27:16 PM PST by eccl1212 ( "anybody else wanna negotiate?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eccl1212
Love the tagline- A classic line by Bruce Willis' character in The Fifth Element- a brilliant, yet overlooked parody of sci-fi movies.
23 posted on 02/12/2004 8:36:14 PM PST by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WhiteChristianCons
Syria has a huge army.

So did their neighbor Iraq. #4 in the world at one time in the not too distant past.

24 posted on 02/12/2004 8:49:48 PM PST by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
This is a perfectly suitable precursor to invasion. So I guess that's: 1. Afghanistan 2. Iraq 3. Syria 4. Iran 5. ? if you're scoring at home.

Just like a chess game. Only with the fate of the world at stake.

25 posted on 02/12/2004 9:18:31 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe (The brighter you are, the more you have to learn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
Just like a chess game. Only with the fate of the world at stake.

Thankfully W knows we can't fight the whole Muslim world at once. Keep saying this to yourself, so you don't slip up.

It's a War on Terror. Islam is a religion of peace.

It's a War on Terror. Islam is a religion of peace.

It's a War on Terror. Islam is a religion of peace.

Wink. Wink. Nod. Nod.

That wasn't so hard, now was it?

26 posted on 02/12/2004 9:34:50 PM PST by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
Yes, it soaked into my brain a few months back. Funny thing is, the President told everyone exactly what the plan was in his post 9-11 speech.

I understand what's going on, but Israel will be the stumbling block.
27 posted on 02/12/2004 9:38:53 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe (The brighter you are, the more you have to learn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Fascinating!

Yes it is. We are upping the ante, the terrorists AND those who support them are getting very nervous, and at the same time our economy is booming!

Yes, it is refreshing to have a POTUS with conviction who places his agenda on the oval office desk and not under it!

28 posted on 02/12/2004 11:56:27 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
Yeah but isn't this going to make them not angry and hate us?

And that would just break out hearts! lol

29 posted on 02/13/2004 12:00:21 AM PST by Fledermaus (Democrats are just not capable of defending our nation's security. It's that simple!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
When you think about the situation in the Middle East you almost wonder if it is the crusades all over again without the looting, plundering, pillaging, raping and land acquisition.

Call it the Crusade for Liberty. So now you either are for human liberty or you are against human liberty. bring it up in bthe UN for a vote. Put China on the defensive. Put the Arab world on the defensive. See what countries will sign on because if you are not for Human liberty we will accept your imports.

Would love to see how that fantasy would play out.
30 posted on 02/13/2004 4:59:32 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (60 Senate seats changes the world!! Bury Kerry in 04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: eccl1212
"china for seven"

Yeah right...
31 posted on 02/13/2004 5:19:12 AM PST by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: yonif
yes, we can sanction them as we send them checks!! Some "war on terror"...
32 posted on 02/13/2004 6:18:50 AM PST by LN2Campy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
I REALLY hope you're correct... the White House "Eid" love-ins are just a bit hard to take, you know
33 posted on 02/13/2004 6:20:23 AM PST by LN2Campy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
US to hit Syria with sanctions

I think we should hit Syria with something else:


34 posted on 02/13/2004 7:08:07 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (If universities didn't teach worthless subjects, who would?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Don't worry: the French and Germans will make sure they get what they need with behind the scenes trading.
35 posted on 02/13/2004 10:48:17 AM PST by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
US to hit Syria with sanctions ICBM's

I was going to suggest several well-placed bunker busters. We can save the ICBMs for later.

36 posted on 02/13/2004 11:20:38 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse (I wonder if Free Republic will be deemed a terrorist organization under Hillary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Very nice, but I'm thinking of something even *more substantial* than those!
37 posted on 02/13/2004 11:30:48 AM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (Dogs have masters; Cats have staff...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mixer
Sanctions will only hurt the citizens of Syria and do nothing to the regime.

The article mentions that we would ban the sale of military or dual use items to Syria. The policy shouldn't affect the civilian population.

On the other hand, you are right about the ineffectiveness of sanctions on Saddam. But Saddam had oil money. I don't think Syria does.

38 posted on 02/14/2004 11:35:16 AM PST by John123 (Ketchup boy has been a poodle to rich women for the past 33 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
It also calls on the president to impose two or more sanctions from a list of six: an export ban; ban on US businesses operating in Syria; restrictions on Syrian diplomats in the US; exclusion of Syrian-owned aircraft from US airspace; a reduction of diplomatic contacts with Syria; or freezing of Syrian assets in the US.

From the above list I hope they ban Syrian planes in American Airspace and toss out Syrian Diplomats. Those are the two things that can be used militarily against us at home. Syria is at war with the United States, the Jihad that they scream from the rooftops is a very real thing. We better tighten our borders before Syria becomes the conduit for nuclear warheads being smuggled into the United States.

39 posted on 02/14/2004 11:52:00 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Maybe they're waiting for us to set an example by kicking the PLO offices out of Washington.

Ouch, good one! Touchdown.

40 posted on 02/14/2004 11:55:32 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson