Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ThinkPlease
Yes, ID predicts than when you find living structures that could not possibly have assembled by chance, self-deluding darwinites will pretend it isn't so!
48 posted on 02/13/2004 6:28:41 AM PST by metacognative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: metacognative; ThinkPlease
ThinkPlease: Is there a testable ID theory with predictive power that has actually been rigorously applied to the biological sciences?

metacognative: Yes, ID predicts than when you find living structures that could not possibly have assembled by chance, self-deluding darwinites will pretend it isn't so!

In plain English, without the gratuitous slur, "NO". There is no ID theory, hence no biological predictions.

[pretending that ID were a scientific theory with researchers]

OK, is there any group doing research to find such a thing? Keep in mind that the earlier proposals, such as eyes, blood clotting cascade, and flagella, have all been shot down.

BTW, standard biology doesn't claim that things "assembled by chance"; it claims that they evolved.

57 posted on 02/13/2004 7:16:23 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson