[Virginia-American]

ThinkPlease: Is there a testable ID theory with predictive power that has actually been rigorously applied to the biological sciences?

metacognative: Yes, ID predicts than when you find living structures that could not possibly have assembled by chance, self-deluding darwinites will pretend it isn't so!

In plain English, without the gratuitous slur, "NO". There is no ID theory, hence no biological predictions.

[pretending that ID were a scientific theory with researchers]

OK, is there any group doing research to find such a thing? Keep in mind that the earlier proposals, such as eyes, blood clotting cascade, and flagella, have all been shot down.

BTW, standard biology doesn't claim that things "assembled by chance"; it claims that they evolved.

[metacognative]

I found your post difficult to decipher. Intelligent design is just normal science without the off-limits signs.
If the evidence points to a conclusion, consider it. What is so hard to understand? You don't seem to get it. Darwinites are the ones giving up real science for a belief system that doesn't stand up to the facts.