Replies

Much better to throw the whole country to the dogs (or to the Dems, which is worse) just to prove a point.

It's better than claiming to fight a war on terrorism, while allowing the terrorist to waltz across the boarder all day.
Did anybody else hear the Mexicans screaming Osama on t.v.?
No offense but lunatics don't just come from the middle east. They come from everywhere. Hard to protect against, while inviting them in. Our military is doing a great job overseas. Rumsfield, and team are to be applauded.
G.W. is however doing poorly looking after us in the U.S.
They are fighting to keep them there, while Bush is doing everything possible to escort them in.
It only took 9 of theirs to kill 3000 of ours. Not in Iraq.
Right in our our back yard.
What in the world is he thinking about?

It's better than claiming to fight a war on terrorism, while allowing the terrorist to waltz across the boarder all day.

And which of the possible Democrat candidates would do better? Last I heard, Kerry wants to grant unconditional amnesty and immediate citizenship.

I am not a big fan of the way immigration is being handled, but if you decide to vote against Bush on that one issue, you are voting for a worse policy that he has proposed - and for more liberal justices on SCOTUS, more aborted babies, Kyoto, UN domination over our foreign policy... all of the things the Dems want to impose on our country. Just keep the big picture in mind.