[swampfox98]

Find yourself a candidate pure enough for yourself and vote for him.

Listen, I am a Republican who grew up with Republican ideals. I don't consider myself "pure" as you insult would indicate. I consider myself an American who is sick to death of voting for people who say one thing and do another. (Unlike some people who care nothing for the path America is taking under Bush.)

[Howlin]

(Unlike some people who care nothing for the path America is taking under Bush.)

Ah, there it is; your last refuge. Can't make a point? Then try to insinuate you care more about the country then I do.

I am stating a simple fact: George Bush is our candidate this year.

What you chose to do about that is your business; but I wish you all would stop trying to make US feel bad about the decisions we've made by making statements just like the one you made above.

[quidnunc]

swampfox98 wrote: Listen, I am a Republican who grew up with Republican ideals. I don't consider myself "pure" as you insult would indicate. I consider myself an American who is sick to death of voting for people who say one thing and do another. (Unlike some people who care nothing for the path America is taking under Bush.)

But Bush is doing what he said he'd do — as the prescription drug benefit for Medicare law proves.

[AFPhys]

I consider myself an American who is sick to death of voting for people who say one thing and do another.

I agree with you on this, and it is primarily why I am so skeptical of the Demodogs.

I would be interested in knowing exactly what things President Bush stated during the 2000 campaign that fits this beef of yours, though. I found myself NOT supporting his nomination due to the stance he had on several issues. I supported him in the general election despite those disagreements, but I've not found anything he has done to be inconsistent with what he said he would do.