Conservatives Need to Get Real

The Intellectual Conservative ^ | 02 February 2004 | Scott Shore

[Agamemnon]

Bush could very well be derailed by the betrayal of many of the people who voted for him last time.

Henrietta, aka "Judas in half-size support stockings," reveals her game plan in none too subtle detail....

[Henrietta]

I said: "Bush could very well be derailed by the betrayal of many of the people who voted for him last time."

To which you replied: "Henrietta, aka "Judas in half-size support stockings," reveals her game plan in none too subtle detail...."

You misunderstand. The Bush reelection plan could be derailed because HE has betrayed the people who voted for him last time. But I think you understood exactly what I meant.

The rest of your earlier post does not merit a reply.

[lainde]

Kudos! Stay on that soapbox!

[Agamemnon]

"You misunderstand. The Bush reelection plan could be derailed because HE has betrayed the people who voted for him last time. But I think you understood exactly what I meant."

That's all fine and well, but it is not I who misunderstand but rather you who grossly mis-speak. I shall quote you directly again:

Bush could very well be derailed by the betrayal of many of the people who voted for him last time.

Now you say what you really meant to say was that Bush has betrayed conservatives... blah blah blah... it's all Bush's fault... blah blah blah... "But I think you understood exactly what I meant."

Maybe in the course of derailing your argument I got your Buchananoid half-size ham-hock hackles up there just a bit and it left you fundamentally confused and dumbstruck in your speech patterns and in your subsequent reply. Single issue people like you vote with their emotions, not with common sense, and you are here for all to see in all your splendor: the poster child example of the toung-tied malcontent. The more you post, the more you prove my point.

Either that, or it sounds like you need a basic course in subject-verb agreement. Presuming, however rightly or wrongly, that you are a female heterosexual who is married or has a significant male other in your life in some capacity, I pity your husband, or boyfriend on account of the relational strain he must endure for your inherent inability to communicate any thought clearly, or one which is unfettered by your irrational emotionalism.

I'll quote you again and give you the opportunity to renounce the statement:...I'm not voting for him EVEN IF THAT MEANS WE GET JOHN KERRY....I call us "principled."

BTW, posting threats to Freepmail is quite unbecoming of you and it won't help you win arguments... at least not in these forums.

[Henrietta]

That was not a threat. You are on notice that the Admin Mods have taken notice of your namecalling and abuse. Keep it up, and you may have a very short tenure here.

[Agamemnon]

That was not a threat. You are on notice that the Admin Mods have taken notice of your namecalling and abuse. Keep it up, and you may have a very short tenure here.

Sure it was. Oooooh I'm scared now. Next thing you know you're gonna slap me with demerits, send me to the principal's office for a spanking, and call my mommy too.

I don't think Moderator's concern themselves much with people who can't hold up their own end in a discussion, and who, when they are exposed for making the stupidest of statements, go whining and tattling to them about it. They can read, and recognize your Kerry love-pap about as well as anyone here can, I'm sure.

I'll just keep reminding everybody -- Mods included -- exactly how stupid a statement it is that you can make:

"...I'm not voting for him EVEN IF THAT MEANS WE GET JOHN KERRY....I call us "principled."

It's quite amusing to watch an intellectual playtoy like yourself and as you have become for me not just lose the argument, but like the Tazmanian devil, just completely lose your mind too, as you continue to babble on incoherently.

Maybe you can be awarded the FreeRepublic forum's keeper of that "coveted" title reserved for those who make half-sized half-witted Benedict Arnold-style statements:

"Kerry's Favorite Konservative-in-Name-Only Kiss-up!"

You certainly have earned it.

[Henrietta]

"It's quite amusing to watch an intellectual playtoy like yourself and as you have become for me not just lose the argument, but like the Tazmanian devil, just completely lose your mind too, as you continue to babble on incoherently."

How amusing. But I think that this is a better descriptor for you.

[Admin Moderator]

Knock it off.

[nutmeg]

ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

[nutmeg]

ping!

[Triple]

Have Know idea if you check aroud here anymore - but whatever you do - don't google 'owk' to see if you popped up anywhere.

Best regards,