That's all fine and well, but it is not I who misunderstand but rather you who grossly mis-speak. I shall quote you directly again:
Bush could very well be derailed by the betrayal of many of the people who voted for him last time.
Now you say what you really meant to say was that Bush has betrayed conservatives... blah blah blah... it's all Bush's fault... blah blah blah... "But I think you understood exactly what I meant."
Maybe in the course of derailing your argument I got your Buchananoid half-size ham-hock hackles up there just a bit and it left you fundamentally confused and dumbstruck in your speech patterns and in your subsequent reply. Single issue people like you vote with their emotions, not with common sense, and you are here for all to see in all your splendor: the poster child example of the toung-tied malcontent. The more you post, the more you prove my point.
Either that, or it sounds like you need a basic course in subject-verb agreement. Presuming, however rightly or wrongly, that you are a female heterosexual who is married or has a significant male other in your life in some capacity, I pity your husband, or boyfriend on account of the relational strain he must endure for your inherent inability to communicate any thought clearly, or one which is unfettered by your irrational emotionalism.
I'll quote you again and give you the opportunity to renounce the statement:...I'm not voting for him EVEN IF THAT MEANS WE GET JOHN KERRY....I call us "principled."
BTW, posting threats to Freepmail is quite unbecoming of you and it won't help you win arguments... at least not in these forums.