Posted on 02/11/2004 12:49:53 AM PST by kattracks
Randall Robinson, the godfather of the reparations movement, has finally taken his criticism of this country to its logical conclusion: he has moved out of the United States. Robinsons new book, Quitting America: The Departure of a Black Man from his Native Land, recounts his growing disillusionment with his native land, and his decision to leave it and escape to the tiny Caribbean island of St. Kitts. Here, Robinson insists, a racist white majority persecutes blacks at home and crafts an imperialistic foreign policy to kill Arabs abroad. But in his new island home, people are friendly, crime is virtually non-existent, and white people are largely absent. In St. Kitts, Robinson writes, life is lived much as it has been lived. With quiet decorum and unassuming passion.
Before departing to his tropical paradise, Robinson had achieved a great amount of notoriety. A Harvard Law School graduate, Robinson became a leftist hero after he made numerous national television appearances, wrote several books and became the principle architect of the black reparations movement. Princeton University professor (and failed rap artist) Cornel West called Robinson the greatest pro-Africa freedom fighter of his generation in America. Similarly, The Nation magazine, in its review of Robinsons best-selling reparations manifesto The Debt, lauded him for his sweeping historical vision and convincing arguments. The benefits of Robinsons proposal, The Nation insisted, go beyond the merely psychological. By discussing the use of reparations, he focuses attention on one of the most important aspects of American racial inequality the staggering gap in wealth between black and white Americans. Quitting America is also earning high praise. The Christian Science Monitor has dubbed it lyrical, logical, and furious. The Monitor noted that some readers may be turned off by Robinsons aggressive style, but affirmed that readers who persist will find a minority point of view thats difficult to hear in the mainstream media. Robinsons principled ideas will startle conventional wisdom with its unfamiliar perspective. That is a euphemistic way of saying the average American will be dumbfounded at his vicious attack on the greatest nation in the history of mankind.
Frontpage Magazine has provided its readers with a strikingly different portrait of Robinson. Myles Kantor, for example, has called attention to Robinsons uncritical embrace of Fidel Castros dictatorship (see Kantors The Will to Oppose Terror, Frontpage, November 7, 2001). David Horowitz, in turn, has waged a tireless campaign to expose the racism and anti-Americanism of reparations proponents like Robinson (see Horowitzs Uncivil Wars: The Controversy Over Reparations For Slavery). Quitting America confirms these judgements, vindicates Horowitz and makes it clear that five basic, and related, characteristics define Robinson.
The first is Robinsons simplistic view of human behavior: one may say he is a racial determinist. In Robinsons mind, all human action can be explained by the color of ones skin. At no point in Quitting America does Robinson question the scientific fantasy known as race, or even attempt to define what race is. He has nothing to say about the rapidly growing rate of mixed marriages among young white people. Further, Robinson has no use for such factors as religion, nationality, or morally informed choice; his world revolves around skin color.
Robinson is also defined by his demand for intellectual conformity within his own race. Such conservative black scholars as John McWhorter, Shelby Steele and Thomas Sowell have no place in Robinsons world. Indeed, he seethes with hatred for Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell. As for the two of them (Bush appointees) that are ours, he writes, I am all the more ashamed They are killers, remote perhaps, but killers nevertheless, like all the others, but more cowardly than the ordinary street types. Powell, in particular, receives the harshest rebuke. He is, according to Robinson, a Ronald Reagan rectal success of a conscience-dead black man. All this because Powell, Rice and others dare to think for themselves, rather than regurgitate Robinsons anti-American bile.
Robinsons third defining characteristic is blatant disregard for historical fact. In particular, he mythologizes an Africa that outstripped the rest of the world in scientific and cultural progress. He hails Africa, not Greece and Rome, as the birthplace of democratic civilization. He insists that Europe before 1500 was a vast wasteland of ignorance, an allegation that would shock Plato, St. Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Leonardo da Vinci and Geoffrey Chaucer. Robinson recounts how a friend visited a Timbuktu library and read a fourteenth-century African rejoinder to Machiavellis The Prince a most impressive feat, when one considers that Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513 (the 16th century). In discussing the modern world, Robinson claims, only white countries are capable of killing so many (people) at one time, but fails to mention the horrible 1994 Hutu massacre of close to one million Tutsi in Rwanda. He also praises Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide as a passionate democrat and one of the finest human beings I have ever known but says not one word about his corruption and widespread human rights violations. And these are but a few representative examples of his tainted historiography. Robinson is no friend of truth.
Robinsons fourth defining characteristic is his red-hot hatred for America. America, he believes, is racist and imperialist. In Robinsons fevered mind, Americans only act out of self-interest, think nothing of killing and starving millions, and seek to rule the world. Blacks and browns, he believes, should not waste their time on America, as it has ceased any pretense of effort on domestic racial and social justice issues. Trying my very best, Robinson writes, how could I, in good conscience, remain for [sic.] a country that has never ever, at home or abroad, been for me or for mine? He continues, I can remember in my forty years of social activism no occasion where American policy was instinctually consistent with Americas stated creed of freedom. Is Robinson living in the same country that waged a Civil War to free the slaves, threatened a second to end Jim Crow, has provided massive job-training programs for blacks, Affirmative Action to beneficially distribute all available jobs and billions more dollars in welfare programs to those who could not or would not find gainful employment? The same nation that just sacrificed 500 men and women to free the innocent people of Iraq from a violent dictator, no thanks to Robinson and his friends?
Robinson does not just hate America, though; he also viscerally hates white people. Whites and white countries (he would lump the multi-racial United States into this category) are of no use to blacks. He insists, the mere contact with whites invariably has produced for us all [black people] one plague or another: slavery, colonialism, plunder, conquest, massacre, economic globalization, culture transplantation. White people, wherever they are, pose a mortal threat to civilized and humane values. Western whites, fumes Robinson, once well inside the place of anothers different, less pugnacious, more welcoming culture, destroy it, root and branch. For inexplicable reasons, they are seemingly constrained by some aberrant force of nature to disparage all culture, all history, all religion, all memory, all faces, all life not theirs. Nonetheless, he asserts it is the whites who are racist, not him. Whites dont give a sh-t what we think, he proclaims. Never did. Never will. Whites are, in sum, little more than upper primates, exactly the kind of gutter language the Ku Klux Klan uses in regard to blacks. Unlike the Klan, Robinson gets rave reviews in the New York Times.
Such flagrant historical revisionism and pig-ignorance is, sadly, all too typical of the "Afrocentric" school of thought.
For the most crushing and irrefutable debunking of said (quasi-)intellectual hokum: the champion was, and remains, Lefkowitz's Not Out of Africa; and i commend it to your attention. :)
After all, didn't America's first black president "restore democracy" there in 1994?
I see a red door and I want to paint it black .......
I'll bet he wasn't alone in that.
Most of us, the world over, want feedom, peace from antagonists, a little food and a place to live.
An American journalist who spent time in Africa, and came to appreciate that his ancestors had bee brought out of that drakness, even by the means of slavery.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.