Skip to comments.
Man-made diamonds could rock gem sales
The Indianapolis Star ^
| February 8, 2004
| John Stehr
Posted on 02/10/2004 6:24:07 PM PST by Samwise
Edited on 05/07/2004 6:27:07 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Gary Thrapp has studied countless diamonds in his 30-year career, but he never has seen one like this.
"It looks flawless," says the Indianapolis jeweler.
What he has in front of his jeweler's loupe is not the product of millions of years of nature, but a couple of hours in a laboratory.
(Excerpt) Read more at indystar.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bestfriend; debeers; diamonds; gems; manmade; valentibesday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-175 next last
I wonder what Marilyn Monroe would say.
1
posted on
02/10/2004 6:24:07 PM PST
by
Samwise
To: Samwise
Bryant Linares, and Apollo Diamonds better have very very good bodyguards, cuz I think DeBeers might put a hit out on him if he doesn't cease and desist.
2
posted on
02/10/2004 6:29:45 PM PST
by
Frohickey
To: Samwise
Gemologist Mike Nealon of Master Jewelers in Castleton put it this way: "Most people, I think ladies especially, are not going to want a simulated stone. They're going to want the real thing." Now there is a "professional" that comes off sounding like a used car salesman (with apologies to used car salesmen).
If chemically and physically (hardness, index of refraction, etc.) it is indistinguishable from a "natural" diamond then it is the "real" thing!
3
posted on
02/10/2004 6:30:20 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: Samwise
"Most people, I think ladies especially, are not going to want a simulated stone. They're going to want the real thing."Joke! Joke! Affordable jewelry bump!
To: Tax Government
Now, the status thing will not be to have "a" diamond, but to have the BIGGEST, multi-dozen-carat diamond. The race is on!
To: Samwise
I am predicting a large, explosive fire in an otherwise sleepy industrial park in the near future. Followed by the unexplained disappearance for several of the areas industrial scientists.
This is DeBeers' worst nightmare come true, and they have had a long time to plan for what to do when it happens.
6
posted on
02/10/2004 6:32:45 PM PST
by
Ronin
(When the fox gnaws -- Smile!!!)
To: Samwise
about time. 100 years of Debeers monopoly is enough. I hope this guy gets undercut as well. There are rumors that I believe, that Debeers is literally sitting on millions and millions of diamonds, only carefully doling them out in order to inflate the market value.
Sorry ladies. $20,000 or $200 for an exact diamond? Hmmm... perhaps that $20,000 would be better spent on a down payment for a house.
7
posted on
02/10/2004 6:33:18 PM PST
by
dogbyte12
To: Samwise
Buy a platinum ring instead... Platinum went from $650 to $850 an ounce this year.
8
posted on
02/10/2004 6:33:37 PM PST
by
Odyssey-x
To: Tax Government
They make pearls under controlled conditions. Why not diamonds.
9
posted on
02/10/2004 6:34:47 PM PST
by
tbird5
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: Samwise
"Apollo plans to sell its man-made diamonds at 30 percent less than natural diamonds" File this under "Famous Marketing Mistakes."
11
posted on
02/10/2004 6:35:16 PM PST
by
TommyUdo
(The Democrat Party-- Proudly Pimpin' off Po' Folk since 1964)
To: tbird5
True! And most of the rubies, sapphires and emeralds you see in the Kay Jewelers etc ads are lab grown as well when one reads the very fine print....;)
12
posted on
02/10/2004 6:36:51 PM PST
by
BossLady
To: Samwise
The result is a more perfect diamond than nature can create, but jewelers say that doesn't mean they will be marketable. Indianapolis jeweler Thrapp says the value of a diamond goes far beyond its beauty. More perfect! Excellent. A lot better than mined crap with all those imperfections or dirt embedded in them. Probably harder too.
13
posted on
02/10/2004 6:38:45 PM PST
by
evolved_rage
(All your base are belong to us.)
To: Samwise
I wonder what Marilyn Monroe would say. I know what Pamela Anderson would say:

"Fake diamonds? Hey, who am I to complain?"
14
posted on
02/10/2004 6:39:38 PM PST
by
martin_fierro
(Shhh. Navel contemplation in progress)
To: dogbyte12
I heard that they had cut a deal with the Russians after they threatened to open the vaults and flood the markets.
Still, I don't shed a tear for De Beer's!
To: Samwise
There was an article in some magazine years ago about some guy who made diamonds in his garage with a welding torch, a ceramic crucible, and leftover Chinese food. He would put the grub in the crucible, heat it up until the unwanted elements burned away and he was left with nothing but carbon, then cooked it gently until it crystallized. He ended up with good quality industrial diamonds. I would love to see the DeBeers monopoly smashed. These guys should make tons of lab diamonds, then flood the market with them, forcing the price down. They should also start making diamonds that dwarf Liz Taylor's stones, showing that natural has it's limits.
Can't wait.
16
posted on
02/10/2004 6:40:07 PM PST
by
Othniel
(Democrats are like roaches: Shine the Light on them, and they scatter for the darkness.)
To: Samwise
This will do VERY interestign things to Africa.
17
posted on
02/10/2004 6:40:21 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(You can see it coming like a train on a track)
To: BiffWondercat
I am wondering about the science applications as well. Don't they use diamonds in some laser configurations? There is research involved with diamonds I know. This should lower costs in that regards, especially since these "diamonds" are flawless.
To: dogbyte12
I hope this guy gets undercut as well. There are rumors that I believe, that Debeers is literally sitting on millions and millions of diamonds, only carefully doling them out in order to inflate the market value. Notice that this guy doesn't want to see a price crash either. He says he'll price his man-made diamonds at 30% below the current market levels. The reality is that man-made diamonds will probably cost a tiny fraction of that to manufacture. Unless this guy has a really strong patent, or better yet a trade secret that can't be reverse-engineered, he'll eventually see cheap diamonds flood the market and become a commodity item that costs little more than glass.
I'd love it if diamonds ceased to be an artificially-inflated luxury item and instead were cheap enough to exploit for industrial uses and cutting edges and surface hardeners, etc., etc.
19
posted on
02/10/2004 6:42:30 PM PST
by
dpwiener
To: Samwise
LOL It's about time someone breaks the De Beers stranglehold on the diamond market. They say if not for them withholding diamonds, diamonds would be cheap gemstones.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-175 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson