Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense Dept. Seeks Bush's Guard File
Washington Post ^ | 2.9.04

Posted on 02/09/2004 9:04:56 PM PST by ambrose

Defense Dept. Seeks Bush's Guard File

By Lois Romano

Washington Post Staff Writer

Tuesday, February 10, 2004; Page A07

The Defense Department has requested that President Bush's payroll records from his service in the National Guard be sent to Washington from a DOD archive in Colorado, to ascertain whether they can be released to news organizations and public interest groups that have formally requested them in recent days, according to DOD officials.

[snip]

At issue is a 12-month period, commencing in May 1972, when Bush moved to Alabama to work on a senatorial campaign. He received permission to transfer to an Alabama unit and was instructed to report to duty there. There is no definitive evidence in his file that he reported to the Alabama unit to perform drills; Bush has said he did report and perform drills.

Bush's personnel records also are vague on what he did in the Texas Guard after returning to Houston after the Senate election he worked on. The first date in the records for 1973 is May 29, when they indicate he attended drills. The records show he attended drills at least 18 times between May 29 and July 30.

[snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: awol; bush; deserter; dod; ignorantlefties; militaryrecord
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Just mythoughts
The Islamofascists have to laughing their butts off... they're aiming to kill EVERY LAST ONE OF US, and this crap seems to be the number one topic.
21 posted on 02/09/2004 9:18:41 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ExposeDem
These docs are floating all over the net in different places. They were obtained back in 2000.
22 posted on 02/09/2004 9:19:33 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
According to the WSJ, Bush made his service files available during the 2000 election. The Democrats are counting on the public not waiting for a response and only hearing the accusations.
23 posted on 02/09/2004 9:19:49 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Eva
His and allllll the little donkey's running for president, those in public and that one hidden behind the curtains, polling her negatives every week.
24 posted on 02/09/2004 9:20:16 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
To be honest, I'd rather not have a partisan of either strip doing any vetting.

These records should be released as a matter of course.

We shouldn't have to require additional Government agencies to make these guys do what they should be required to do before they toss their hat in the ring.

That goes for both sides of the aisle...

All this BS about locked up records, or records secreted away in this Presidental library, or that Governor's private record stash should be grounds enough to eliminate that person from even running, much less winning the Oval office.

I would dare say, I'd like to see included in that records release ALL arrest records, all criminal records, and the like.

Let's get this crap into the sunlight...
25 posted on 02/09/2004 9:24:04 PM PST by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Does give one pause what priorities some have. This has come to child's play, ignoring the warnings each and every day.

26 posted on 02/09/2004 9:24:42 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All
Start looking into Kerry's voting record's on military programs...Here's one for ya, Apache? That kick ass helo of ours, Kerry voted against. And there are WAY more military programs that are resulting in today's victories that Kerry has voted against. Once I have a compiled list, I'll post it to it's own thread. Kerry's voting past is damning.
27 posted on 02/09/2004 9:24:57 PM PST by Michael Barnes ( <a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">miserable failure </a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ExposeDem
What's the area blacked out? Anyone know?

Dick Cheney and Halliburton paid $5 billion to have that removed. Yes indeed, they will pay that much to have one word redacted.

28 posted on 02/09/2004 9:30:06 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wattsup
All the files from 1973 back burned at the St. Louis facility, that includes records from the Civil War, W.W.I, W.W. II, Korea, etc.. There are duplicate records of some of that stuff.
29 posted on 02/09/2004 9:32:13 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lord_Baltar
You really think "records" would exist if one had ambitions for becoming the President.

Sounds like an ideal plan, but we are dealing with human beings, and human nature had not changed one bit.

I really don't need to see JFKerry's records to know the man is a two faced politician. His VOTES recorded along with the public record of his speeches, give me plenty to determine his character.

What kind of a man "VOTES" to give the authority to go to WAR and a few short months later, for his own political expediency will not vote to FUND that war. Then he has the nerve to claim he cares for VETERANS. This is public knowledge no need to see any files.
30 posted on 02/09/2004 9:33:25 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The article said that the copy they had back in 2000 didn't have a name and SSN on it. How come your copy has Bush's name on it? Are these different versions or different files?

Anyone know if those payroll records were public info in 2000?
31 posted on 02/09/2004 9:37:07 PM PST by cat lover too (Yes, I do question Tim Russert's patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I take it your post indicates that the Post is lying and the records are already public???
32 posted on 02/09/2004 9:39:23 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
To be honest, I don't disagree with your view, however, that being said, I still think BOTH sides need to have their feet held to the fire on this, and let the chips fall where they will.

I'm sick to death of these guys, again, both sides, wrapping themselves up in rented uniforms, then acting all offended when the idea of the public seeing their actual military records is suggested.

33 posted on 02/09/2004 9:39:28 PM PST by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ExposeDem
Social security #?
34 posted on 02/09/2004 9:42:24 PM PST by faithincowboys ( Zell Miller is the only DC Democrat not committing treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
Sorry but your dates on the fire are wrong, the latest being 1964 and it wasn't all records. See link;

http://www.archives.gov/facilities/mo/st_louis/military_personnel_records/fire_1973.html

Just want to get the facts we quote as accurate as possible. We're not liberals.

35 posted on 02/09/2004 9:42:30 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
ARF is not service. This shows points awarded but not dates of service. It is QUITE possible that W slacked off a bit- ARF is a kind of disciplinary HOLD like TDA. No duty days are served in ARF usually. The document you give practically proves that while W was young he made some sort of mistake and got disciplined. Also possible is that he was ARF in Texas and served in Alabama. The records will clear that up.
36 posted on 02/09/2004 9:50:54 PM PST by AdequateMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Wow, a lot of words expended in all this that seem pretty dam useless...I think I graduated from college in 1972 but dont ask me to swear to it,it was over 30 years ago.
37 posted on 02/09/2004 9:54:17 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
These docs were delivered in response to FOIA requests back in the 2000 election, and have been posted on Bush-hating blogs. With these docs, they have been reduced to now speculating that Bush was disciplined for bad behavior, and these records really pertain to some kind of military prison Bush was in.

No, I am not making that up.
38 posted on 02/09/2004 9:54:28 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I think I might not have shown up for further traning either, at this point....

</>

Bush seems to have gotten an "early-out", as did Kerry. As did Gore. Even Clark, who got canned.

39 posted on 02/09/2004 9:57:00 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
This is so absolutely unbelievably ridiculous, inane and irrelevant to anything, I now expect a major campaign issue to arise over Quemoy and Matsu at some point before the election.
40 posted on 02/09/2004 10:00:42 PM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson