Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deployed soldiers put new shotgun to the test
Army Times ^ | Feb 09, 2004 | Matthew Cox

Posted on 02/09/2004 1:54:42 PM PST by fso301

Edited on 05/07/2004 10:06:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: SAMWolf
Yeah, I want one, for "home defense" of course.

Me too. Too bad our 'betters' won't let us have one...

41 posted on 02/09/2004 3:31:20 PM PST by null and void (Bad enough to take our money, do they need to make the taxes complicated to torture it out of us???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Isn't he gonna tear off his thumb after the first shot?

It looks like he's got it hooked around the action.


I hope it is a non-reciprocating bolt handle, but even so, I wouldn't risk it.

My concern is relying on the flimsy M-16 mag as a grip might be hard on those Reynolds Wrap buggers.
42 posted on 02/09/2004 3:37:43 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fso301
Muzzle blast must be quite spectacular.
43 posted on 02/09/2004 3:54:40 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilantcitizen
There have been some threads on this thing in the last year. You could probably search around and find them.
44 posted on 02/09/2004 4:55:09 PM PST by FreedomPoster (This space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Squantos; fso301
Army Times reports:   "Some soldiers serving in Afghanistan are testing a new shotgun...It has a 7¾-inch barrel, compared to most riot-style shotgun barrels that measure between 18 to 20 inches..."

UNITED STATES v. MILLER, 307 U.S. 174, 178 (1939):   "In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a 'shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length' at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense."

My, my, my, now isn't that interesting!

--Boot Hill

45 posted on 02/09/2004 4:59:57 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I've seen one of those beauties. They would be quite effective for scaring off unwanted people.
46 posted on 02/09/2004 5:35:25 PM PST by Maigrey ("I wasn't disengaged. I was bored as hell and my mother told me never to interrupt." -Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rllngrk33
Does that mean I can now legally own a sawed off shotgun?

Of course you can. You've always been able to, they're not illegal. Same as with an SBR. I think the tax is 200 bucks. (They might be considerd an AOW for 5 bucks, but I don't know exactly what qualifies as an AOW and I don't think any type of shotgun would).

47 posted on 02/09/2004 5:44:50 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Isn't he gonna tear off his thumb after the first shot?

It looks like he's got it hooked around the action.

They've got it exactly right- The LSS is a straight-pull repeater, NOT a semiauto. Hooking his thumb there allows him to pull the action handle back by just straightening his fingers out and using his thumb to crank the action, faster than removing his supporting hand and using it to pull the knob back, then slam it forward.

What'll you bet that previous complaints about how* I shot him 5, 6 times with my M4, but he kept on coming* are about to come to a screeching halt, at least for those who stagger in to about 40 yards or so where the buckshot will reach out to.

-archy-/-

48 posted on 02/09/2004 5:56:10 PM PST by archy (I was told we'd cruise the seas for American gold. We'd fire no guns-shed no tears....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dd5339; Vic3O3; Travis McGee
New toy ping
49 posted on 02/09/2004 5:59:02 PM PST by cavtrooper21 (Hajj pojj, I still haven't forgotten 9/11.... Unlike most Liberals and their terrorist pals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
It seems the soldier is in a pose for PR purposes. Most likely he's not actully firing said weapon. If this were an actual test, a "technical advisor" would most certainly correct the grip. IMHO.
50 posted on 02/09/2004 6:02:16 PM PST by martian_22 (Who tells you what you are?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Street Sweepers and Strykers were reclassified as destructive devives. Destructive devices are legal to own depending on your state of residence. Same with automatic weapons.
51 posted on 02/09/2004 6:05:58 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: templar
If you can talk the company into civilian sales and they are willing to sell you one you can legally own this little toy... Provided the BATFE will give you the paperwork and the tax paper.

For about $2000.00 plus shipping. (and the $200.00 gov't fee)

However you'll be seeing the boys from the BATFE alot more than you want to..
and you'll be wasting your money as it will be declared a "Scarey-Looking Gun" and banned (unless it's for Government use..) as soon as a Dem gets a toe-hold in the White House. Then the JBTs will have all the excuse they need to come by your house with flash-bangs and sub-machineguns and "help" you turn in that "evil gun"...
53 posted on 02/09/2004 6:13:31 PM PST by cavtrooper21 (Hajj pojj, I still haven't forgotten 9/11.... Unlike most Liberals and their terrorist pals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: archy
Arch -
You really need to watch the pics of weapons you post.

The twin double barrels are "heart breakers", not life takers...
54 posted on 02/09/2004 6:17:37 PM PST by cavtrooper21 (Hajj pojj, I still haven't forgotten 9/11.... Unlike most Liberals and their terrorist pals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: archy
I never thought I'd say this, but we need more broken links on this forum.
55 posted on 02/09/2004 6:18:42 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: archy
beats a red x
56 posted on 02/09/2004 6:23:34 PM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: archy
Wow, never thought I'd need a cold shower after looking at some double barrels.
57 posted on 02/09/2004 6:26:12 PM PST by Pylon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rllngrk33; Beelzebubba; archy
Does that mean I can now legally own a sawed off shotgun? I'm thinking the Miller decision is now a moot point.

Great catch!

58 posted on 02/09/2004 9:50:28 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
VERY interesting! Time to revisit Miller, maybe someone should saw off a shotgun to ten inches and take it out to a public range, with lawyers and cameras? And copies of these articles, naturally.
59 posted on 02/09/2004 9:55:41 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Vigilantcitizen
I'd rather keep my 870 and an M4 and M203.........40MM HEDP just gives me that warm and fuzzy feeling . Just me.

Stay Safe !!

60 posted on 02/09/2004 10:07:14 PM PST by Squantos (Salmon...the other pink meat !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson