Replies

Another post from tpaineintheass, another distortion.

"pointed at the government" meant that the militia was pointed at the government not that the government was not bound by its strictures. Any non-moron would have known that from the context of the post which was clearly discussing what the militia was to protect and from whom.

Suspected gangsters are not disarmed and I never discussed them rather, as would be clear to non-morons, the felons composing the terrorist gangs called Crips and Bloods were under discussion.

Said nothing about "allowing" majority rule to prevail but rather of the necessity to have more of the population understand the unnecessary gun control laws.

Pardon me for quoting portions of the 2d, what a sin.

States were not bound by the BoR until the 14th amendment was passed no matter how often you claim the contrary. You even referenced the case in 1833 which decided the question in another thread.

Inmates are NOT the issue but the falsity of the Absolutist theory of the 2d amendment is one I was discussing.

Then there will continue to be attempts to restrict gun owners rights. If it is true that the majority will be for restricting them they will be further restricted. I hope that will not be the case but throwing out leaders like Bush will ensure that it will. Particularly since it would mean the SC will have more liberal judges appointed to it.

You brand yourself as a believer in the 'militia' theory of the 2nd.. -- then go on to say:

-- "Nor do I believe the amendment was pointed at the government" ---
An outright admission that, to you, our various levels of government are not bound by "shall not be infringed"..

To ice the cake, you claim that blacks in LA who are suspected of gangsterism have no RKBA's as such laws may be "justifiable and necessary".

And to finish up you make an emotional appeal that we should allow majority rule to win on the AWB renewal, --- as when maybe a new majority gains power it would "go away", -- using the same harebrained theory..

Jsuati, my boyo, you are WAY over the edge here..
-- Thanks.. Bizarro posts like yours are alotta fun..

_______________________________________

Another post from tpaineintheass, another distortion.

"pointed at the government" meant that the militia was pointed at the government not that the government was not bound by its strictures.

Any non-moron would have known that from the context of the post which was clearly discussing what the militia was to protect and from whom.

You stated:

-- "Nor do I believe the amendment was pointed at the government" ---

-- An outright admission that, to you, our various levels of government are not bound by "shall not be infringed"..

Yep, even morons like you can see that, -- and that the rest of your reply is just another moronic repeat of the well refuted positions you've been spouting here for two days..

Give it up, gungrabber.. Your crediblity will never recover from this thread.. You've blown your cover & burnt your bridges..