Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peggy Noonan: Philosophy, Not Policy - Why Bush isn't good at interviews(Bush and Russert on MTP)
WSJ via Drudge ^ | 2/9/04 | Peggy Noonan

Posted on 02/09/2004 7:57:11 AM PST by SquirrelKing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: Fenris6
I'd take Noonan over Coulter.

Noonan:

- droll delivery

- no fireworks

- uses obscure references to history

- dull, drab looks.

61 posted on 02/09/2004 10:07:18 AM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
I guess there is JUST going to be no statifying some people, we have become too jaded as a people, too demanding in our expectations, expecting - no demanding entertainment level banter and MTV-level performances from anybody's mug who appears on TV. Is that last explanation close to the mark? Noonan: - droll delivery - no fireworks - uses obscure references to history - dull, drab looks.

Make up your mind Mr. Contrarian :)

62 posted on 02/09/2004 10:10:25 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
By this eye, Peggy's got that one.

Peggy over Ann?

Have your wrists always been a little limp.. or did it just sneak up on you?

63 posted on 02/09/2004 10:13:16 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Delta-Tango
"If you don't like the way the President's speeches are prepared and delivered, then apply for Mrs. James Carville's job, and write them yourself."

LOL. Apparently some WH staffers are lurking instead of working :) Denial is a river. Half the country doesn't believe Saddam EVER had WMDs - because we've got some arrogant comm peeps who don't bother to understand their audience.

Otherwise - pls explain how WE defend Bush's positions here better than THEY do on national TV...
64 posted on 02/09/2004 10:14:06 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
"Peggy over Ann? Have your wrists always been a little limp.. or did it just sneak up on you?"

LOL. Even this former Marine prefers Red Wine over Malt :)

When you grow older & wiser you'll garner a greater appreciation of "class"
65 posted on 02/09/2004 10:15:37 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6
LOL. I'd take Noonan over Coulter. Every. Single. Time

Peggy had sex once... She thinks it was in 1978 or it could have been in 1980... she can't really remember for certain. She can't even remember her dates name.. but she thinks she wore Este Lauder perfume.

66 posted on 02/09/2004 10:15:59 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6
As for the personal attacks, Noonan's character has always been above reproach. She's never been a bomb-thrower or character assassin. As a former Reagan speech writer (remember him?) she knows her stuff. If she says Bush came off weak, she's trying to help - not hinder. So listen. Bottom line: if the Bush peeps can't fix their communcation problems, the Republicans will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in Nov.

Wow! There are TWO of us on this site who want Bush to win, but don't drink Kool-Aid. I have been trying to make this point as well, and I hope to be out of the hospital next week.

You realize this IS Free Republic where you are making this point? Tell ya what -- I'll volunteer to start YOUR car in the morning, if you'll start MINE....Oh, forget it Fenris, we both have families to think about. So lets just give up and get in line. Do you want grape or orange flavored?

67 posted on 02/09/2004 10:16:48 AM PST by Delta-Tango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Okay - now you're just being a nasty troll. Noonan is married if I recall.

Go pound sand Troll
68 posted on 02/09/2004 10:17:20 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Delta-Tango
Wow! There are TWO of us on this site who want Bush to win, but don't drink Kool-Aid. I have been trying to make this point as well, and I hope to be out of the hospital next week

Agreed. Apparently the DNC trolls are alrady at work here :)

69 posted on 02/09/2004 10:18:37 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6
"Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall"

Words have power. Those words were the tipping point that sundered an Evil Empire. I don't expect Bush to be a wordsmith, but his comm people are doing him a disservice.
70 posted on 02/09/2004 10:22:56 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Good analysis.
71 posted on 02/09/2004 10:24:37 AM PST by SquirrelKing (February 5, 2003 - One year since signing up on FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing; The Wizard
Good article, SK.

And damn straight Wizard.

Peggy and Rush and others got this one wrong. They wanted vitriol, they wanted revenge, themselves, but they got (we got) instead, a man who spoke from the heart, STATED his dedication to his POLICIES (geeez Peggy----were to set to criticize and therefore MISSED his tremendous declaration of standing by his policy REGARDLESS of opponent's wailing and ranting or poll numbers? Did you MISS that one?)

President Bush simply tramples his critics and opponents with his unique ability be himself at all times. Just by being himself, in his direct, straight 'speak' and steadfastness, he makes his opponents seem smallish and rather petty.

Regarding President Bush's interview from my perspective-

This man, this good man, made his points clearly and without that creepy clintonian wordplay that the democrats seem to need to resort to because they are unconvicted and vascillate with the wind.

What I remember clearly from the interview was our President taking a moment to speak directly to the parents of our precious troops who have sacrificed with their very lives in Iraq.

And when he spoke in defense of the National Guard and let it be known that trashing himself was ok, but trashing the importance of our National Guard was pathetic...just WOW!

And lastly, he spoke so directly to all of us with his decisive declaration that he is NOT poll driven, never will be, will NOT be changing his policies in terms of what he believes will keep our nation secure and exactly how he percieves America's role in this world and how he intends to pursue this vision, regardless.

I love him.

He elevates this nation with his refusal to bend to the whims of opponents, be it press corp or their bosses at the DNC, or foreign nations wanting to hold back America for nefarious reasons. This President will NEVER sacrifice our national wellfare for a piece of gold, a fake coalition or a false shadow of security in exchange for a slice of popularity.

Very unclintonian of this good statesman.

Rock solid, 'bring it on' type talk. No fear, no vascillation, what it is - is what it is. Is that refreshing or what? (No wonder this man drives democrats crazy by simply being himself! LOL)

What you see is what you get and what you hear you can depend upon type talk.

Embrace it or vote for someone else type of stance because this man is NOT going to vascillate with popularity polls. He takes defending this nation SERIOUSLY.

I understand this, and it gives me great hope.

And horsepatuddy to Peggy if she cannot understand CLARITY when it is right there in front of her....President Bush has LESS SMOOZE and fancy rhetoric that Ronny, LESS DRAMA and UNCONVICTED, DOUBLE EDGED, WISHYWASHY rhetoric than Billy, and, frankly, it is this quality, after his deeply held relationship with our Father, that I LOVE about this good man.

72 posted on 02/09/2004 10:25:12 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6
Make up your mind Mr. Contrarian :)

I'm still 'fishing' for why you weren't satisfied with my president's 'performance?

I guess he has to 'move' into a sphere, an 'act' that isn't his own, IOW, become someone who he is not in order to satisfy some ...

I *still* have to point out that I think he was working to defuse 'ol Timmy boy and his barbed, semi-caustic, projected to be 'hard-hitting' style.

I guess you're not familiar with the GWB 'style' that calls for significant underplay of one's position UNTIL it is necessary to nail the opposition tot he wall.

73 posted on 02/09/2004 10:26:36 AM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Republic
"And horsepatuddy to Peggy if she cannot understand CLARITY"

Clarity involves making a point in less than 500 words :)

The cluelessness continues. Half the country has fallen prey to leftist propaganda & distortions re Iraq and the WoT.

If Bush crashes in Nov, it'll only be the fault of the same peeps who let "its the economy stupid" go unanswered. Now that I think about it, those same peeps are prob running his comms. Sigh.
74 posted on 02/09/2004 10:30:22 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
"I'm still 'fishing' for why you weren't satisfied with my president's 'performance?"

He came off as confused & distracted. And yes, as a Texan, I'm very familiar with his style. I like his frank and honest approach. When he's on, like post 9-11, he's perfect. He wasn't on last night.
75 posted on 02/09/2004 10:33:20 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
So, WHEN we find the weapons (as soon as we finish counting and cataloging them all) and we drag Osama from his own private hole in the ground, the election will be over.

Well if he gets Osama before the elections I will stay home. If Osama is still out there I may vote for Bush. So Bush probably should keep Osama out there for a while yet.

76 posted on 02/09/2004 10:34:54 AM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

I like her, and I do think she makes an attractive and classy spokesperson for Conservatism, but she's tendentious. And I think her 'upper west side' side got the best of her here, and she got it wrong.

However, as to the assertion made by a fellow poster, that she's only done 'it' a couple of times, I'd like to counter and deflate that assertion with a reminder that she is the 'surly bonds' girl, after all.

77 posted on 02/09/2004 10:40:51 AM PST by AlbionGirl ("Ha cambiato occhi per la coda.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6
He came off as confused & distracted.

AND these are words +24 hrs AFTER the fact - and without benefit of review - so I give them little credence!

YOUR big error is IN FORGETTING those very lucid and poignant remarks he made in support of his position during his interview.

In short, without benefit of review your points, your observations, your impressions, as unbased and as ungrounded as they are, are becoming meaningless ...

78 posted on 02/09/2004 10:42:21 AM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6
I don't put word numbers upon defining clarity. We all hear the same things differently, some requiring more explanation than others. I believe historical context is ALWAYS an important issue to include when a President is explaining a policy decision.

I appreciated President Bush's careful and deliberate explanations.

And I REALLY appreciated hearing this man declare that he will NOT be changing his policy (his belief in freedom being the primary right of all citizens of the world, his belief that America has a responsibility to lead in this effort towards peace, and his convicted and unbending dedication to routing out terrorists wherever they run in order to protect his nation and others, the part of his job he takes as the single most important responsibility of a President).

Peggy lost her marbles, momentarily, I hope.

79 posted on 02/09/2004 10:43:58 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ItsTheMediaStupid
Well if he gets Osama before the elections I will stay home.

Hey, do me a favor, okay?

If you are stupid enough to even contemplate not voting in the next election, save it for someone who gives a damn.

I really have no need to hear from idiots who would put this country at risk because they not like one particular thing or another that this President does. You people are sickening, and I would rather not enter into a dialog where I have to provide the brains for both sides of the discussion.

80 posted on 02/09/2004 10:44:42 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson