Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WKB
That's why they will tap Edwards for Veep.
12 posted on 02/09/2004 5:33:55 AM PST by BunnySlippers (a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">miserable failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BunnySlippers; goldstategop
That's why they will tap Edwards for Veep.

That'd be a losing strategy IMO. Bush's victory margins in the south were generally too big to make up in one election cycle. If I were the Dem nominee, Dick Gephardt would be my running mate. That'd give 'em a shot at Missouri (Bush only beat Gore/Nader by 1.7% in MO). It'd help in Ohio (Bush only beat Gore/Nader by 1.0% in OH). Then I'd target FL, NH, WV, AZ, CO and NV, which are the other non-Southern states where Bush beat Gore/Nader by less than 5%. There's no need for the Dems to look South in 2004 for the top of the ticket. Of course, it's a different story for the Senate races in play.

18 posted on 02/09/2004 6:04:35 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: BunnySlippers
Yah, a southern senator for the running mate of a Mass. polititian! That worked wonders for Dukakis back in 88!

Oh, wait, no it didn't. They lost to some guy called 'Bush'.

62 posted on 02/09/2004 8:19:51 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson