To: Elsie; All
Speaking of biologists....
They say that the cheetahs are endangered because the DNA of them is too much alike. Too many first cousins gettin' it on kitty style and the inbreeding will sap the strength of them soon or later.
If that's so, then HOW did each separate specie we see today ever get to be so robust and strong, if they TOO started with just a few individuals??
Did the E rules CHANGE somewhere?
90 posted on
02/09/2004 5:24:00 AM PST by
Elsie
(When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
To: Elsie
Now, now, now Elsie, we will have none of that stating the obvious with a group of people who have invested their entire worldview on a patchwork of ideas that you expose as an irreparable model. Can't we all just get along.
92 posted on
02/09/2004 7:31:51 AM PST by
bondserv
(Alignment is critical!)
To: Elsie
If that's so, then HOW did each separate specie we see today ever get to be so robust and strong, if they TOO started with just a few individuals?? What makes you think this is part of evolutionary theory?
94 posted on
02/09/2004 7:56:13 AM PST by
js1138
To: Elsie; All
Let me try again.....
Speaking of biologists....
They say that the cheetahs are endangered because the DNA of them is too much alike. Too many first cousins gettin' it on kitty style and the inbreeding will sap the strength of them soon or later.
If that's so, then HOW did each separate specie we see today ever get to be so robust and strong, if they TOO started with just a few individuals??
Did the E rules CHANGE somewhere?
158 posted on
02/10/2004 9:42:31 AM PST by
Elsie
(When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson