To: Dataman
I've been told by little people that I couldn't be a good biologist without believing evolution. My college professor with a doctorate in biology disagreed.
52 posted on
02/08/2004 6:26:03 AM PST by
cyborg
To: cyborg
I've been told by little people that I couldn't be a good biologist without believing evolution. My college professor with a doctorate in biology disagreed. So what? After all, it's not as if he was some kind of rocket scientist or anything.
53 posted on
02/08/2004 7:46:11 AM PST by
ventana
To: All
The old canard "Humans descended from apes" has been shown by the E folks to REALLY be "Humans and apes descended from a common ancestor".
Now the folks who study humans say that the 'opposable thumb' is what has given us such a great advantage over other critters: that it has given us 'tool making and using' abilities that FAR outstrecth the other animals.
My question is this: "Just WHEN did the monkeys, apes and lemurs get their opposable thumbs on their FEET?"
It seems to ME that this would give THEM a FOURfold advantage....
Another question: did our 'common ancestor' have two or four thumbs?? Did the M-A-L line EVOLVE the extra two after the split or did we HUMANS merely DEVOLVE them after the split?
102 posted on
02/09/2004 10:00:39 AM PST by
Elsie
(When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson