So far, all the *credentials* I've seen from you are what you say you are, (and what I remember about you.) If you want to play fallacy and fantasy philosophy, might I DARE suggest that some of your *comments* about my comments are ad hominem, ridiculous, as well as woefully uninformed.
The pharmaceutical companies have been used against Bush on this thread.
Enron has been used against Bush on this thread.
Halliburton too, if my eyes haven't deceived me.
Any idea why they are slaughtering cattle, EV?
Strawman? In a pig's eye, pal. I KNEW I knew you.
There you go again. It is dishonest to bring those things into a discussion between you and I, since I certainly didn't bring any of them up, nor were any of them central to this discussion. It is a cheap ploy to drop them in the middle of our talk in the vain hope that somehow the silliness of others might somehow stick to me.
That's the kind of crap I'm complaining about. While I have not said a word against the President, and am in fact a supporter that is actually doing something positive on this behalf, you, and others here, by throwing every argument you can think of against everybody, simply piss off people who don't need to be further pissed off right now.
Y'all are bulls in the china shop, politically speaking. None of you will ever be offered a diplomatic post, I assure you.
Any idea why they are slaughtering cattle, EV?
Yes, I know. Contrary to what you obviously believe, I'm not stupid. They are slaughtering cattle because of mad cow disease.
But the idea that this is an intentional attack on us by the Canadians is about the most classic case of tinfiol conspiracy crap I've ever seen.
As to relevency? Well, you'll have to explain that.