Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hon; Alamo-Girl; Ragtime Cowgirl
I'm looking at a copy of Bush's 1973 carrear summary:

As of 1 Oct 73 it credits him with duty at these assignments:

"HD TR TexANG Per ANGR36-05, SO ANG-A 158, State of Texas AG Dept, Austin, Tx and transferred to ARPC (ORS), 3800 York St, denver, CO 80205 effective 2 October 1973. (DOS TexANG 1 Oct 73)."

That means he was satisfactorily discharged ( to inactive Reserve in Denver on 1 Oct 73 (start of the fiscal year), after duty in Tex Air National Gaurd Headqtrs, and officially credited duty for the Alabama Air National Guard: ANG-A 158!

Further: His Officer's Fitness Report (OER Form) for 1 May 72 to 30 Apr 73 from Texas credits him with a routine "Not Observed" default markings - exactly correct when an officer is serving, but not at the same continuous duty station as his commanding officer. The CO can't evaluate him, and the temporary station does NOT EVER issue OER's.

Hint: An Officer "AWOL" (or under any discipline!) does not get that kind of OER.

158 posted on 02/06/2004 6:45:11 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Le viola!


169 posted on 02/06/2004 7:09:28 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
From The Washington Post:

"According to the records, Bush had been instructed to report to William Turnipseed, an officer in the Montgomery unit. "Had he reported in, I would have had some recall and I do not," Turnipseed, a retired brigadier general, told the Globe in 2000. "I had been in Texas, done my flight training there. If we had a first lieutenant from Texas, I would have remembered." .....

"....Reached in Montgomery yesterday, Turnipseed stood by his contention that Bush never reported to him. But Turnipseed added that he could not recall if he, himself, was on the base much at that time."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A7372-2004Feb2?language=printer

185 posted on 02/06/2004 7:55:49 PM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Thanks for the information!
197 posted on 02/06/2004 9:30:54 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; Hon; yall
Thanks ! Do you have the document URL or link where you found that 'career summary' ?

I saved Hon's discharge document posted in #169 on this thread.


221 posted on 02/07/2004 4:45:05 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; Freee-dame
Further: His Officer's Fitness Report (OER Form) for 1 May 72 to 30 Apr 73 from Texas credits him with a routine "Not Observed" default markings - exactly correct when an officer is serving, but not at the same continuous duty station as his commanding officer. The CO can't evaluate him, and the temporary station does NOT EVER issue OER's.

***

The reading comprehension-challenged anti-Bush crowd obviously jumped on the Not Observed comment as meaning Not Present for Duty! They are such liars, they lie to themselves.

234 posted on 02/07/2004 8:51:58 AM PST by maica (Mainstream America Is Conservative America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson