Skip to comments.
Ohio gov. signs bill banning gay marriage
AP
| 2/06/04
Posted on 02/06/2004 2:53:52 PM PST by kattracks
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) Gov. Bob Taft approved one of the country's most-far reaching gay-marriage bans on Friday, saying its adoption was urgent because the nation's first legally sanctioned same-sex weddings could take place as early as this spring in Massachusetts. The bill, which Taft signed in private, also prohibits state employees from getting marital benefits for their unmarried partners, whether homosexual or heterosexual.
Approving the bill to make gay marriages "against the strong public policy of the state" became more pressing after the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled 4-3 this week that denial of marriage to same-sex couples as unconstitutional, Taft said.
"It is necessary for us to act now to safeguard Ohio's marriage laws," Taft said. "Ohio could have same-sex couples who were 'married' in Massachusetts taking legal action in Ohio to recognize that marriage and to obtain the resulting benefits."
When the law takes effect in 90 days, Ohio will become the 38th state to adopt a "defense of marriage act" and the second to deny benefits to some employees' partners.
Taft, a Republican, denied assertions that the law promotes intolerance. He said the new law would send a strong positive message to children and families.
"Marriage is an essential building block of our society, an institution we must reaffirm," he said.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: family; gaymarriage; govbobtaft; homosexualagenda; marriage; ohio; prisoners; protectmarriage; romans1; taft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: dubyaismypresident
It's my understanding he signed it.
To: therut
Gov Taft did not sign CCW. He was overridden on a VETO!
-----
He signed it, according to "Ohioans for Concealed Carry":
http://www.ohioccw.org/article1697.html
There was a threat of an override, but I'm not sure if there were enough votes or not. There probably were since he signed it fairly quickly after it hit is desk.
To: little jeremiah
Please add me to your ping list. Thanks in advance.
23
posted on
02/06/2004 5:04:38 PM PST
by
mrustow
To: mrustow
WIll do!
To: little jeremiah
Thanks! Things may get pretty hot and heavy (with articles, that is!), if you'll pardon the pun.
25
posted on
02/06/2004 5:33:28 PM PST
by
mrustow
To: dubyaismypresident
>>Maybe his boss....err wife, finally got conservative.
Maybe she got mugged by a gay punk.
26
posted on
02/06/2004 5:37:03 PM PST
by
swarthyguy
(Russia doesn't conduct negotiations with terrorists -- it destroys them," Vlad Putin)
To: therut
Yea, I thought he vetoed it.
Hasn't it been stopped by some liberal judge?
To: kattracks
Now all the queers in Ohio will have to move to the
Gay State
28
posted on
02/06/2004 6:16:47 PM PST
by
Hotdog
To: kattracks
Taft, a Republican, denied assertions that the law promotes intolerance. How silly. Of course it promotes intolerance. However, it promotes intolerance of a twisted behavior. Why is it wrong to be intolerant of twisted behavior? I would think that would be a good thing.
Homosexuals don't need tolerance, they need treatment.
29
posted on
02/06/2004 8:02:02 PM PST
by
ArGee
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." - George W. Bush)
To: ArGee
To all the Conservatives who think electing Republicans is wrong if they don't agree 100% with your feelings: Do you think a Democratic Governor would sign this?
To: little jeremiah
So is your list of people getting bigger and bigger after the Ma gay agenda judicial perverts mugged the citizens of Ma.?
I have been telling the wishy washy Episcopalians that this would happen, and they would be forced to make a decision as the nation is being forced.
Keep up the good work!
31
posted on
02/06/2004 11:28:06 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(John F' Kerry! You are not John F. Kennedy! You're just another $oreA$$ puppet.)
To: Hotdog
Now all the queers in Ohio will have to move to the Gay State IF only. Then I could pick up property in Lakewood on the cheap.
32
posted on
02/07/2004 8:15:04 AM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(February 6th, THE President's Day. Birthday of Ronald Reagan.)
To: Grampa Dave
Thanks - I just ping'em when I see'em!
And I will be wtiting up a vanity, I guess on Monday. I've got ideas of what I can do, and others can do, to thwart the homo-nazis. It seems as though it is coming to a head, as in a giant boil. They want to defeat us utterly, and any compromise is wrong. Look what's happened already - and they are vicious, and won't rest until every kid K-12 has a "gay" counselor and no one is allowed to say one word against "gays".
What to speak of cannibalism - although I have to admit that if homosexuals began to eat for dinner and lunch, it has its upside... ;-)
To: little jeremiah
Keep doing what you are doing, posting the reality of the Gay agenda.
Then we can use that reality to wake more moderates.
34
posted on
02/07/2004 8:40:40 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(John F' Kerry! You are not John F. Kennedy! You're just another $oreA$$ puppet.)
To: kattracks
All of us who emailed, phoned, or wrote to Gov. Taft should send him our best wishes on this signing.
I have differences with him over taxation, but this has restored some confidence about other areas.
35
posted on
02/07/2004 8:50:24 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
To: dubyaismypresident
He said he would veto if they didn't make some changes on the CCW law...some changes were made and he signed it.
36
posted on
02/07/2004 11:58:45 AM PST
by
ruoflaw
To: dubyaismypresident
Ain't it the truth? Then we no longer would need to call it Flakewood.
37
posted on
02/07/2004 12:04:24 PM PST
by
Tuxedo
(Zed's Dead....)
To: delapaz
Gore didn't win Ohio ! and Taft only won on concealed carry promises
38
posted on
02/07/2004 1:33:24 PM PST
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(I may never have the Courage to say some words but i will always have it to say what i believe !!!)
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: kattracks
I'm wondering how long it will be before some judge declares it "unconstitutional".
40
posted on
02/07/2004 6:29:20 PM PST
by
He Rides A White Horse
(I wonder if Free Republic will be deemed a terrorist organization under Hillary?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson