1 posted on
02/06/2004 8:27:04 AM PST by
blam
To: blam
This is big news.
2 posted on
02/06/2004 8:29:44 AM PST by
pabianice
To: blam
Cool, dude.
3 posted on
02/06/2004 8:32:16 AM PST by
gridlock
(BARKEEP: Why the long face? HORSE: Ha ha, old joke. BARKEEP: I was talking to John Kerry!)
To: blam
Yep. Another wonder of science that emerged out of the slime. The intense and infinitely complex nature of the simplest parts of nature continue to strengthen my in intelligent creation by the God I know.
Love the Jewish concept of how to understand whether God exits or not - get up in the morning and go outside.
4 posted on
02/06/2004 8:32:48 AM PST by
txzman
(Jer 23:29)
To: blam
Nice!!! The doubters will be all over this thread telling us how laws of physics show that it will never be possible to get cheap hydrogen and therefore it is a waste of time to even look for a solution.
6 posted on
02/06/2004 8:33:37 AM PST by
TBall
To: blam
This could make hydrogen powered vehicles pracitcal. Now to overcome the Hindenberg effect.
7 posted on
02/06/2004 8:35:12 AM PST by
templar
To: blam
Wow, I hadn't even thought of doing it this way, or of checking into how plants do it. Guess thats why I am not a real scientist, LOL.
8 posted on
02/06/2004 8:35:21 AM PST by
Paradox
(Cogito ergo Doom.)
To: blam
Too bad it's not scalable to commercial levels.
10 posted on
02/06/2004 8:38:57 AM PST by
balrog666
(Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.)
To: blam
Great! Now if they can only find a way to drain a bit of that hydrogen off before the plant uses it to make its cellulose, we will have some real progress.
To: blam
Producing hydrogen from water is the stuff of science fiction It is? Since when?
15 posted on
02/06/2004 8:41:15 AM PST by
Johnny_Cipher
(Making hasenfeffer out of bunnyrabbits since 1980)
To: blam; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ApesForEvolution; ..
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
17 posted on
02/06/2004 8:44:40 AM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: blam
Wasn't there a fiction book called "The Water Engine" that dealt with this subject? A bunch of evil oil executives put the kabosh on it cause it would put them out of business. I recall reading a review about it a few years ago.
Eco-nutcase conspiracies aside, I might be willing to pay 3X the amount for my energy needs if it meant bankrupting one of the main sources of income to terrorists and the exportation of Whabbism. I would think that eventually the method would be refined and the price would come down in time.
Hey, the Europeans and Japanese pay way more than the US does for gasoline. We're spoiled. It would be cool to see h2o being used in this manner. And no, I'm not an SUV-hating enviromentalist whacko because I desire an alternate energy source to oil.
18 posted on
02/06/2004 8:45:44 AM PST by
demnomo
To: blam
Invest in manganese.
19 posted on
02/06/2004 8:47:23 AM PST by
#3Fan
To: blam
I think this is great news, however I don't know enough about the subject to say anything else. I do have some questions however, and I'm not being a wet blanket, I want something like this work.
1. Would the system only use distilled (pure water)? If not, how would additonal contaminats, minerals, particals in the water be dealt with?
2. How would we deal with areas of the country like the South West that has very high mineral content in the water to begin with and where, due to population influx, will in 20 to 30 years have a critical water shortage? Do we drink the stuff of put it in our transportation?
Best Regareds
Sergio
21 posted on
02/06/2004 8:50:09 AM PST by
Sergio
(If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
To: blam
btttrl
26 posted on
02/06/2004 9:00:18 AM PST by
Ff--150
(OutYourBellyLivingWaters)
To: blam
As I have said before on similar threads; hydrogen separation is not a "source" of energy, just a transport vehicle. It is because the H2O atom is the lower energy state of the hydrogen and oxygen atoms involved that burning hycrogen releases heat energy. This is what happens when hydrogen is burned: it combines with atmospheric or other oxygen to form water vapor and release energy. So if we start with water and end up with hydrogen and oxygen, we have to provide the same amount of energy to separate the h2 and o2 as is released when they combine.
When plants perform this transformation, they must in some way be using solar power (in addition to the catalyst mentioned) to effect the change. If this is the case, and we could copy and scale the process, it COULD appear to be almost free because there is so much solar energy available and because present solar systems are so innefficient, that this method would appear to be free by comparison.
Another poster was correct in noting that nuclear separation could appear to be very cheap. You would just have to account for the cost of the electricity which would otherwise be sold. The energy involved is not coming from the hydrogen but from the nuclear fuel, which was an original "source", because the potential energy was already in it when we dug it out of the ground.
To: blam
I wonder how much water and acreage they would need?
39 posted on
02/06/2004 10:22:09 AM PST by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: blam
Holy cow, I sure look forward to the day I can fill up my tank with a garden hose.
41 posted on
02/06/2004 10:31:14 AM PST by
LibWhacker
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: blam
bump
To: blam
So we should expect a car from Kia in the future called the Kia Chia, powered by a Chia pet?
To: blam
Producing hydrogen from water is the stuff of science fiction - and some comments by US President George Bush.Er, doesn't just sticking two electrodes in water do the trick? Oxygen collects at one electrode and hydrogen at the other?
104 posted on
02/06/2004 6:16:30 PM PST by
JoeGar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson