Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/06/2004 8:27:04 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam
This is big news.
2 posted on 02/06/2004 8:29:44 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Cool, dude.

3 posted on 02/06/2004 8:32:16 AM PST by gridlock (BARKEEP: Why the long face? HORSE: Ha ha, old joke. BARKEEP: I was talking to John Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Yep. Another wonder of science that emerged out of the slime. The intense and infinitely complex nature of the simplest parts of nature continue to strengthen my in intelligent creation by the God I know.

Love the Jewish concept of how to understand whether God exits or not - get up in the morning and go outside.
4 posted on 02/06/2004 8:32:48 AM PST by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Nice!!! The doubters will be all over this thread telling us how laws of physics show that it will never be possible to get cheap hydrogen and therefore it is a waste of time to even look for a solution.
6 posted on 02/06/2004 8:33:37 AM PST by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
This could make hydrogen powered vehicles pracitcal. Now to overcome the Hindenberg effect.
7 posted on 02/06/2004 8:35:12 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Wow, I hadn't even thought of doing it this way, or of checking into how plants do it. Guess thats why I am not a real scientist, LOL.
8 posted on 02/06/2004 8:35:21 AM PST by Paradox (Cogito ergo Doom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Too bad it's not scalable to commercial levels.
10 posted on 02/06/2004 8:38:57 AM PST by balrog666 (Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Great! Now if they can only find a way to drain a bit of that hydrogen off before the plant uses it to make its cellulose, we will have some real progress.
13 posted on 02/06/2004 8:40:42 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Producing hydrogen from water is the stuff of science fiction

It is? Since when?

15 posted on 02/06/2004 8:41:15 AM PST by Johnny_Cipher (Making hasenfeffer out of bunnyrabbits since 1980)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ApesForEvolution; ..
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
17 posted on 02/06/2004 8:44:40 AM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Wasn't there a fiction book called "The Water Engine" that dealt with this subject? A bunch of evil oil executives put the kabosh on it cause it would put them out of business. I recall reading a review about it a few years ago.

Eco-nutcase conspiracies aside, I might be willing to pay 3X the amount for my energy needs if it meant bankrupting one of the main sources of income to terrorists and the exportation of Whabbism. I would think that eventually the method would be refined and the price would come down in time.

Hey, the Europeans and Japanese pay way more than the US does for gasoline. We're spoiled. It would be cool to see h2o being used in this manner. And no, I'm not an SUV-hating enviromentalist whacko because I desire an alternate energy source to oil.
18 posted on 02/06/2004 8:45:44 AM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Invest in manganese.
19 posted on 02/06/2004 8:47:23 AM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I think this is great news, however I don't know enough about the subject to say anything else. I do have some questions however, and I'm not being a wet blanket, I want something like this work.

1. Would the system only use distilled (pure water)? If not, how would additonal contaminats, minerals, particals in the water be dealt with?

2. How would we deal with areas of the country like the South West that has very high mineral content in the water to begin with and where, due to population influx, will in 20 to 30 years have a critical water shortage? Do we drink the stuff of put it in our transportation?

Best Regareds

Sergio
21 posted on 02/06/2004 8:50:09 AM PST by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
btttrl
26 posted on 02/06/2004 9:00:18 AM PST by Ff--150 (OutYourBellyLivingWaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
As I have said before on similar threads; hydrogen separation is not a "source" of energy, just a transport vehicle. It is because the H2O atom is the lower energy state of the hydrogen and oxygen atoms involved that burning hycrogen releases heat energy. This is what happens when hydrogen is burned: it combines with atmospheric or other oxygen to form water vapor and release energy. So if we start with water and end up with hydrogen and oxygen, we have to provide the same amount of energy to separate the h2 and o2 as is released when they combine.

When plants perform this transformation, they must in some way be using solar power (in addition to the catalyst mentioned) to effect the change. If this is the case, and we could copy and scale the process, it COULD appear to be almost free because there is so much solar energy available and because present solar systems are so innefficient, that this method would appear to be free by comparison.

Another poster was correct in noting that nuclear separation could appear to be very cheap. You would just have to account for the cost of the electricity which would otherwise be sold. The energy involved is not coming from the hydrogen but from the nuclear fuel, which was an original "source", because the potential energy was already in it when we dug it out of the ground.
28 posted on 02/06/2004 9:07:02 AM PST by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I wonder how much water and acreage they would need?
39 posted on 02/06/2004 10:22:09 AM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Holy cow, I sure look forward to the day I can fill up my tank with a garden hose.
41 posted on 02/06/2004 10:31:14 AM PST by LibWhacker (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
bump
43 posted on 02/06/2004 10:35:52 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
So we should expect a car from Kia in the future called the Kia Chia, powered by a Chia pet?
84 posted on 02/06/2004 1:00:39 PM PST by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Producing hydrogen from water is the stuff of science fiction - and some comments by US President George Bush.

Er, doesn't just sticking two electrodes in water do the trick? Oxygen collects at one electrode and hydrogen at the other?

104 posted on 02/06/2004 6:16:30 PM PST by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson