Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/06/2004 8:21:09 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: farmfriend
Global warming ping.
2 posted on 02/06/2004 8:21:44 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Do you think 600 years will be enough time for them to organize an evacuation, or will they all be sitting their office towers as the waves wash over the roofs?
3 posted on 02/06/2004 8:24:05 AM PST by Tax-chick (Baby #7, boy #4, born 1/19/04, 8 lbs., 15 oz. (I am not liable for incoherent posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Pumping out underground water while increasng the weight of surface structures is not global warming.
4 posted on 02/06/2004 8:25:09 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
How can they even measure a sea level rise of twenty millimeters? That seems like it would be well under the "noise" margin. Perhaps the Dutch will give them a good price for Shanghai.
5 posted on 02/06/2004 8:27:13 AM PST by Dan Cooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I'm not sure I'd feel safe in a six hundred year old skyscraper.
10 posted on 02/06/2004 8:34:28 AM PST by whereasandsoforth (tagged for migratory purposes only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Parts of Venice have been periodically underwater for centuries now.

So what.
11 posted on 02/06/2004 8:34:37 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
If is does sink in to the ocean that filthy sh*t-hole will leave a ring around the world!
12 posted on 02/06/2004 8:37:29 AM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ApesForEvolution; ..
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
13 posted on 02/06/2004 8:38:28 AM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Robert A. Cook, PE
the gleaming skyscrapers of China's financial hub Shanghai could be entirely submerged in 600 years

Shanghai ... sank as much as 2.63m between 1921 and 1965

The sea had risen 20mm since 2000 and should keep climbing over the next decade

Rule #1: Always run the numbers.

Lessee, 2.63m in 44 years. 2.63 x 600 / 44 = 36 m.
20 mm in 4 years. 20e-3 x 600 / 4 = 3 m.
Linear projected subsidence relative to sea level over 600 years = 39 m, or about 125 feet.

Man, are those ever some tall skyscrapers!

15 posted on 02/06/2004 8:38:37 AM PST by Eala (Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The headline writer could have done better:

"Soliloquist Scientist Says Shining Shanghai May Slowly and Silently Slip Under the Shimmering Sea"

Now say it ten times as fast as you can...
17 posted on 02/06/2004 8:39:07 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat (If Bush loses, it will be a Giuliani/Powell ticket in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Reminds me of what Moe once said to Curly: "For two cents I'd knock your brains out ... if you had brains."
20 posted on 02/06/2004 8:42:24 AM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson