Skip to comments.
GOP slams Bush policies at retreat
The Washington Times ^
| 2/6/04
| By Ralph Z. Hallow and James G. Lakely
Posted on 02/06/2004 1:27:31 AM PST by ovrtaxt
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:13:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760, 761-780, 781-800 ... 1,101-1,119 next last
To: nopardons
Whew! Thin skin LOL!
761
posted on
02/06/2004 9:52:24 PM PST
by
sauropod
(I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy!)
To: sauropod
Never mind the man behind the Halliburton curtain. Wow. Is there no DU talking point "true conservatives" will not use against this administration?
To: hellinahandcart; sauropod; nopardons
Oi! What are you all arguing about?
Clue me in?
I'm only a thick Mick! ;-)
763
posted on
02/06/2004 9:54:23 PM PST
by
Happygal
(Le gách dea ghuí)
To: Texasforever
You got a brown spot on your nose.
764
posted on
02/06/2004 9:54:23 PM PST
by
sauropod
(I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy!)
To: hchutch
![](http://members.shaw.ca/victoriausa/SaberCrouch.jpg)
The onyl thign that grates on you is that I don't cut backstabbers of YOUR persuasion any slack. How dare I have the gall to not have a dobule standard? How DARE I disagree with the self-appoitned arbiters of what is and what is not a conservative position?
hchutch, you're all about cutting yourself a double-standard when you explain over and over again how it's OK for you not to vote for Warner when he's the nominee, but if anyone else fails to vote for a GOP nominee for whatever reason suits them, they're indirectly voting for a Democrat. If you hold that the only valid reason to withhold your vote for a nominee is betrayal of the party, then the party itself has become your supreme political value. Fine, we're both in the same party, so I don't care why you usually vote Republican. The value of your vote is not determined by the values that motivate it. However, other voters may have different supreme political values. Their line in the sand might not be your line in the sand. So, accept that, and do what you can to hold the coalition together. I submit, however, that badgering, silly flames about posters' screen names, and random melodramatics are probably not going to get it done.
|
765
posted on
02/06/2004 9:55:20 PM PST
by
Sabertooth
(The Republicans have a coalition, if they can keep it.)
To: Happygal
Beamish vs. Guinness.
Can't you tell?
766
posted on
02/06/2004 9:55:23 PM PST
by
sauropod
(I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy!)
To: sauropod
You got a brown spot on your nose. Now there you go again getting personal.
To: Ches
You keep butting in with inanities. Either say something of value, or keep quiet. This is now, the reality is that fringe parties are either irrelevant or spoilers. Not a one, on the right, is going to become the " new "/replacement for the GOP in '04, or anytime in my lifetime.
To: sauropod
Oh Shite, Guinness wins hands down! *LOL*
You had to argue over that? *LOL*
769
posted on
02/06/2004 9:57:49 PM PST
by
Happygal
(Le gách dea ghuí)
To: Sabertooth
"The value of your vote is not determined by the values that motivate it." To whom?
At what point does the pursuit of somebody's vote override the values that motiveat the vote?
When do we hang up the flashing red light?
770
posted on
02/06/2004 9:58:11 PM PST
by
sauropod
(I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy!)
To: Happygal; sauropod
Someone mentioned stout so now I'm awake once again! LOL
771
posted on
02/06/2004 9:58:54 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: sauropod; csvset
![](http://members.shaw.ca/victoriausa/SaberCrouch.jpg)
Please define that.
President Bush wears the best of all possible cowboy hats.
|
772
posted on
02/06/2004 9:59:04 PM PST
by
Sabertooth
(The Republicans have a coalition, if they can keep it.)
To: Happygal
I *NEVER* forget ;-)
773
posted on
02/06/2004 9:59:10 PM PST
by
sauropod
(I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy!)
To: Sabertooth
There's NO Perot, there was
NO lesson taught in '92, and a lot of voters are morons, stupid, selfish, and will vote Dem.
OTOH, though I am NOT overconfident, I do think that the president will be reelected.-)
To: nopardons
Not a one, on the right, is going to become the " new "/replacement for the GOP in '04, or anytime in my lifetime.Long Live the Queen!
775
posted on
02/06/2004 9:59:37 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: cyborg
Someone mentioned stout so now I'm awake once again! LOL Oi! I'm not stout. I'm not even rotund! *LOL*
~oops~
Oh you mean the liquid gold! Ahhhh! *LOL*
776
posted on
02/06/2004 10:00:32 PM PST
by
Happygal
(Le gách dea ghuí)
To: hellinahandcart
But I'm NOT " yelling " at pod, this is the way we talk to each other. LOL
To: Happygal
What are you all arguing about? What aren't we arguing about?
We are discussing how deeply we should be expected to French-kiss liberals in order to win in November, basically.
To: PRND21
She ain't gonna get it.
779
posted on
02/06/2004 10:01:02 PM PST
by
sauropod
(I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy!)
To: sauropod
Sorry we both missed it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760, 761-780, 781-800 ... 1,101-1,119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson