The Profiler was wrong. Yesterday in the New York Post it was reported that Carlie fought him desparately (can't put in a link as they seem to only have current day's story). She was only passive for the first second or two, and then it was too late.
God or evolution has so constituted most children that when am adult grabs them, they will go along for a few seconds and only then think. This is often a good thing because the child, in such cases, is probably being pulled away from danger (an attacking wild animal in primitive societies, a car today). The child's nature is to go first and then think. Can teaching really overcome this? No, at least not if the attacker is a "good with kids" monster. Does it hurt to try to teach your kids to go against their nature? No. I just think that he was too good and Carlie did not have a chance.