Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bipartisan Immigration Reform Bill Introduced in Senate
murthy.com ^ | feb 04 | Sheela Murthy

Posted on 02/05/2004 4:57:40 PM PST by VU4G10

The U.S. Congress reconvened on January 20, 2004, with Senators Daschle and Hagel quickly introducing immigration reform legislation that many believe the President would be willing to back. The bill submitted has bipartisan support, which means that it is backed by some members of both the Republican and Democratic parties. Senate Bill 2010, if enacted, would call for significant changes in family immigration. The number of family-preference visa numbers would increase, thus reducing the backlogged priority dates. Spouses and minor children of lawful permanent resident spouses would no longer be regarded as preference relatives, subject to visa availability backlogs. These family members would be considered immediate relatives, just like spouses of U.S. citizens. Immediate relatives are exempt from numerical limitations.

In keeping with the President's recent, highly-publicized immigration reform proposal, the bill would also provide a temporary worker program that could lead to adjustment of status to permanent residence for certain immigrants who are currently undocumented. Employment-based visa numbers would be increased under this plan, to allow for the additional applications.

There are limitations on the temporary work program, and it would be reexamined five years after the final regulations are implemented. This means that many of the solutions to illegal immigration potentially could be only short term, without requiring legislative action to bring it to an end. Given the highly political nature of the immigration debate, this would place the program on uncertain footing.

It is important to understand that this is a proposed bill in Congress. As of January 24, 2004, there were 5,751 bills introduced in the 108th Session of Congress. Of these bills, only 198 have been signed into law. None of the remaining 5,553 bills has any legal effect, unless both the House and the Senate pass a bill and the President signs it into law. It is too early, therefore, to assume that this bill will become a law or that immigration reform has begun. Individuals must continue to carefully safeguard against any violations of immigration laws. They must continue to maintain their valid immigration statuses, and make no assumptions regarding the content of any future changes in the law. While we remain hopeful that positive immigration reform legislation will be passed in 2004, there are no guarantees. Many of these measures may simply be election year overtures.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bush; daschle; gop; hagel; immigration; immigration2004; immigrationreform; rats; rino; s2010; sb2010

1 posted on 02/05/2004 4:57:43 PM PST by VU4G10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
Too bad for Daschle and Hagel but their little baby is going to be DOA in the House.
2 posted on 02/05/2004 5:00:40 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
This will never pass the House.

Thank God the framers set up a Bicameral legislature.
3 posted on 02/05/2004 5:13:26 PM PST by Pubbie (We would have the WMDs if Powell and Rice hadn't made a 6 month UN detour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
we can hope.

but the GOP has a long history of giving in to Democrats... Sen Frist fired his aid who did nothing illegal by reading and copying Democrat memo's on an unsecured server... expect that to never change.

4 posted on 02/05/2004 5:14:10 PM PST by GeronL (www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I think it is DOA. Tom Delay is dead against it as is the Speaker of the House. When the Majority Leader and Speaker are against a bill, it disappears into the dark world of subcommittees never to be seen again.
5 posted on 02/05/2004 5:19:24 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
Time to call your senators, folks. I've already called both of mine... twice since the GWB speech. You can't gripe if you don't do your part. Let them know that you consider this to be UNFORGIVABLE.
6 posted on 02/05/2004 5:23:16 PM PST by WayneM (Cut the KRAP (Karl Rove Amnesty Plan). Call your elected officials and say "NO!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
As a legal immigrant, who played by the rules and ASKED to come to God's Waiting Room on earth...(the USA for you people in Madison, WI) this amnesty thing is like urinating on my shoes.

Bottom line if its good for someone's p[ocket...its opk to brake the law. Its just plain wrong...and GW had no business asking for such a change in the rules of immigration.
7 posted on 02/05/2004 5:25:34 PM PST by dinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
"Tom Delay is dead against it as is the Speaker of the House."

Sensenbrenner and Hostettler are also against it (Hostettler chairs the Immigration Sub Committee, and he is a big time immigration hawk).
8 posted on 02/05/2004 5:26:57 PM PST by Pubbie (We would have the WMDs if Powell and Rice hadn't made a 6 month UN detour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
How does that explain CFR?
9 posted on 02/05/2004 5:29:47 PM PST by GeronL (www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
Another stinker.
10 posted on 02/05/2004 5:40:07 PM PST by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
How does that explain CFR?

It doesn't. But...


S 2010 IS

108th CONGRESS

2d Session

S. 2010

To strengthen national security and United States borders, reunify families, provide willing workers, and establish earned adjustment under the immigration laws of the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

January 21, 2004

Mr. HAGEL (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


A BILL

To strengthen national security and United States borders, reunify families, provide willing workers, and establish earned adjustment under the immigration laws of the United States.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

TITLE I-- FAMILY REUNIFICATION

SEC. 101. TREATMENT OF IMMEDIATE RELATIVES WITH RESPECT TO THE FAMILY IMMIGRATION CAP.

SEC. 102. RECLASSIFICATION OF SPOUSES AND MINOR CHILDREN OF LEGAL PERMANENT RESIDENTS AS IMMEDIATE RELATIVES.

limiting the number of visas that may be issued under section 203(a)(2)(A) pursuant to subsection (a)(4)(A)'.

(aa) by inserting `or legal permanent resident' after `citizen' each place that term appears; and

(bb) in subclause (II)(aa)(CC)(bbb), by inserting `or legal permanent resident' after `citizenship';

(aa) by inserting `or legal permanent resident' after `citizen' each place that term appears; and

(bb) by inserting `or legal permanent resident' after `citizenship';

(aa) by inserting `or legal permanent resident status' after `renunciation of citizenship'; and

(bb) by inserting `or legal permanent resident' after `abuser's citizenship';

SEC. 103. EXCEPTIONS.

TITLE II--WILLING WORKER PROGRAM

SEC. 201. WILLING WORKERS.

SEC. 202. RECRUITMENT OF UNITED STATES WORKERS.

an acknowledgement of receipt of the documentation provided to the ES in accordance with this subparagraph.

SEC. 203. ADMISSION OF WILLING WORKERS.

SEC. 204. WORKER PROTECTIONS.

period of stay authorized for that nonimmigrant classification.

SEC. 205. NOTIFICATION OF EMPLOYEE RIGHTS.

SEC. 206. PORTABILITY.

shall not be affected by the denial of such new application.'.

SEC. 207. SPOUSES AND CHILDREN OF WILLING WORKERS.

SEC. 208. PETITIONS BY EMPLOYER GROUPS AND UNIONS.

SEC. 209. PROCESSING TIME FOR PETITIONS.

SEC. 210. TERMS OF ADMISSION.

SEC. 211. NUMBER OF VISAS ISSUED.

SEC. 212. IMMIGRATION STUDY COMMISSION.

SEC. 213. CHANGE OF STATUS.

SEC. 214. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS TO LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENT.

SEC. 215. GROUNDS OF INADMISSIBILITY.

SEC. 216. PETITION FEES.

SEC. 217. TERMINATON OF H-2C TEMPORARY WORKER PROGRAM.

SEC. 218. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 219. COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS.

SEC. 220. REPORT ON WAGE DETERMINATION.

SEC. 221. INELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN NONIMMIGRANT STATUS.

SEC. 222. INVESTIGATIONS BY DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DURING LABOR DISPUTES.

Homeland Security about the employer or employees involved in the dispute should be asked--

SEC. 223. PROTECTION OF WITNESSES.

`STAY OF REMOVAL

`CONFIDENTIALITY OF IMMIGRATION INFORMATION OBTAINED DURING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

SEC. 224. DOCUMENT FRAUD.

TITLE III--ACCESS TO EARNED ADJUSTMENT

SEC. 301. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

`ACCESS TO EARNED ADJUSTMENT

`(aa) Records maintained by the Social Security Administration.

`(bb) Records maintained by an employer, such as pay stubs, time sheets, or employment work verification.

`(cc) Records maintained by the Internal Revenue Service.

`(dd) Records maintained by a union or day labor center.

`(ee) Records maintained by any other government agency, such as worker compensation records, disability records, or business licensing records.

`(aa) the termination of the qualifying relationship was connected to domestic violence; or

`(bb) the spouse or child has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by the spouse or parent who adjusts status or is eligible to adjust status to that of a permanent resident under paragraph (1).

security investigation or prosecution, in each instance about an individual suspect or group of suspects, when such information is requested in writing by such entity.

abuse of discretion or that the findings are directly contrary to clear and convincing facts contained in the record, considered as a whole.

on which the Immigration Reform Act of 2004 was introduced; and

SEC. 302. CORRECTION OF SOCIAL SECURITY RECORDS.


Please excuse any f'ed up formatting as, well, that's just the way it is... Considering...

11 posted on 02/05/2004 6:11:52 PM PST by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: michigander
That was a cruel thing to post
12 posted on 02/05/2004 6:34:18 PM PST by GeronL (www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
How does that explain CFR?

CFR was dead until Enron happened. All of a sudden dozens of members of Congress went ape and started feeling guilty. The media continued to hammer away about how CFR MUST pass because of the evils of Enron. This caused just enough members of the House to use a little known rule to force a bill onto the floor for a vote. It is so rarely used and when it is tried, is rarely successful. Only a major polarizing issue is going to cause another CFR type incident in the House and immigration isn't that type of issue.

13 posted on 02/05/2004 8:34:27 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson