Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
Democrat strategy memos that were not intended for public distribution.

He was not acting as a member of the public. He was a staff member of the Senate.

OTOH, did you read the memos ? Are you also guilty of reading, Democrat strategy memos that were not intended for public distribution ?United States Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 119, also known as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986.

Are you claiming he broke into a computer he did not have access to ?

55 posted on 02/05/2004 10:05:38 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981
He was not acting as a member of the public. He was a staff member of the Senate.

Doesn't matter. He wasn't in the intended distribution, and deliberately accessed said information on a recurring basis.

OTOH, did you read the memos ?

No, just the news coverage.

Are you also guilty of reading, Democrat strategy memos that were not intended for public distribution ?

No.

Are you claiming he broke into a computer he did not have access to ?

Yes. He was not an authorized user of that particular section of the network.

58 posted on 02/05/2004 10:09:13 AM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson