Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach; FBD
Peaches, I think FBD meant CYA in general, I know that is what I've been saying since Bush became President, why he kept Tenet after him being a Clintonite I'll never understand. I feel that Tenet would look for the right screw and turn it and make our President look bad.
21 posted on 02/05/2004 8:14:54 AM PST by JustPiper (D A M N I T O L Take 2 and the rest of the world can go to hell for up to 8 full hours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: JustPiper; Peach
"On chemical and biological weapons, Tenet said analysts believed that Saddam had ongoing programs and perhaps stockpiles and have found no evidence of such ongoing programs. He asserted, however, that the weapons searching teams needed more time.

Two sources with high-level access to Saddam's regime told the CIA in the fall of 2002, shortly before the war, that production of biological and chemical weapons was ongoing, Tenet said.

Those sources "solidified and reinforced ... my own view of the danger posed by Saddam's regime," Tenet said, taking direct responsibility for what was passed on to Bush.

"On one key point that is befuddling weapons inspectors, Tenet said he did not know at this point whether it was possible Saddam's own officials had lied to the Iraqi leader about what his regime had in the way of weapons."

When I read 'Saddam's Bombmaker, by Dr. Hamza, one thing stands out now; how Hamza and his co-workers would tell Saddam's henchmen that their progress on the nuclear program was far ahead of what it really was.

Extrapolating this out to other programs, it seems logical to conclude that all Iraqi scientists were foing the same thing, in order to keep Saddam happy, and perhaps keep their jobs and perks that Saddam doled out (he was known to give new Mercedes to his scientists as incentive) or maybe just to protect their life and family.

Whatever the reason, it just seems to me that our intel guys should have picked up on this.

Let's face it; we were all given the impression that there were MASSIVE quantities of chemical / biological agents in quantities that would not have been at all easy to conceal, or haul to another country.

( 85,000 liters of anthrax, thousands of gallons of mustard gas, Sarin, ricin, etc. I believe to date all that has been found is a small vial of botulinium, and some yellow cake uranium, *possibly* from Iraq.

Illegal, and lethal, yes, but not in the massive quantities that we were all led to believe.

This hyped up number was not needed to prove that Iraq was a threat, especially in the area of supporting terrorists. We know for a fact he was supporting the PLO.

Now, I believe (sadly) that this exageration has hurt our government's credibilty, as it's become the focus, rather than the fact that Saddam was continuing in WMD developement, and that he was covertly supporting terrorism.

52 posted on 02/05/2004 9:17:30 AM PST by FBD (...Please press 2 for English...for Espanol, please stay on the line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson