Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Homosexual: 'Gay Marriage is a Counterfeit and Fraud'
releases.usnewswire.com ^

Posted on 02/05/2004 6:57:16 AM PST by chance33_98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last
To: wai-ming
That's not the point, we were talking about rights.
101 posted on 02/06/2004 4:28:39 AM PST by Guillermo (It's tough being a Miami Dolphins fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
1. If you are a "former alcoholic" as you say, then you would be able to drink normally and responsibly wouldn't you?..Have a few drinks and no problem. But you don't. You totally abtain from alcohol. Why?..because you are an alcoholic. It is an addiction. And the only way to beat an addiction is to totally abstain from the substance that you are addicted to. An addict who abstains from is still an addict. The are a sober addict. They know that if they use again their life will go into turmoil. That is why you totally abstain despite your assurances that you are a" former alcoholic." A sober alcoholic is a person of great character and power. They have been through the fires. The most important part to them to recognize is the truth. Paramount among those truths is that they cannot ever use alcohol under any circumstances. Why?..because they are recovered alcoholics.
102 posted on 02/06/2004 7:49:46 AM PST by tcuoohjohn (Follow The Money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: tcuoohjohn
With all due respect, crap. I don't drink not because I'm afraid I'll slip into uncontrolled drinking, but because I have taken a vow - a promise. Heard of that? Like marriage is a vow, a promise.

Alcoholism is not a disease. Heroin addiction is not a disease (heard that jewel on NPR one day).
Homosexuality is a little different in that it is definitly indicative of personality disorder, but it is still boils down to a matter of choices. We have a certain amount of free will, being human, and we can make good choices or bad.

And the sorry thing is that one bad choice easily leads to another.

No one has to act on their sexual impulses, whether homosexual or otherwise.
103 posted on 02/06/2004 8:33:26 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Thaty's encouraging, thanks.
104 posted on 02/06/2004 8:37:38 AM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
Likewise, long term heterosexual relationships seem mythical too.

Hardly, at least in the neck of the woods I come from.

My grandfather and grandmother were married for over 40 years before my grandmother died.
My mother and father were married for over 25 years before my father died.
My wife and I have been married over 20 years now.
My brother and his wife have been married over 21 years now.
My sister has been married over 10 years now, (13 years younger than me).

Many of my relatives, on both sides of the family, have been married for 20, 30, 40, 50 years or more.

Mythical? Where I come from it's the norm.

105 posted on 02/06/2004 8:43:57 AM PST by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
I'm talking national statistics here.
106 posted on 02/06/2004 8:51:36 AM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
I'm talking national statistics here.

Do we have statistics on long term homosexual relationships?
No?
Why not?

Possibly because they are on the verge of being mythical.

50% doesn't sound so bad from that point of view.

Besides, I got relatives ALL OVER the country. ;^)

107 posted on 02/06/2004 8:56:34 AM PST by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Easy to test your theory isn't it?..If you are a " former alcoholic" as you claim, then you can drink normally then can't you?. You can't. Why?..because you have an addiction to alcohol. The only way to deal with that addiction is to abstain from alcohol in toto isn't it?

Now if you are willing to defend your cured, former, saved whatever alcoholic thesis then you can drink responsibly like any other normal person. You won't because you can't.

Quod erat demonstratum. There is no such thing as a " former alcoholic" There are drinking alcoholics and there are sober alcoholics. Sobriety is laudable and healthy. Denial isn't.
108 posted on 02/06/2004 9:18:51 AM PST by tcuoohjohn (Follow The Money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
You are correct, the number of LTHR's is extremely small.
109 posted on 02/06/2004 9:19:27 AM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: tcuoohjohn
Wrong. You wouldn't recognize logic if it bit you on the butt.

You said something DOESN'T HAPPEN. You have evidence for that except your bare assertion.

A bunch of people say IT HAPPENED TO THEM. All the evidence is locked up in their heads.

Prove them wrong.

110 posted on 02/06/2004 10:20:01 AM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan

" You wouldn't know..if it bit you on the butt"..yadda yadda.

Quit looking at my butt.
111 posted on 02/06/2004 12:16:28 PM PST by tcuoohjohn (Follow The Money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
Now that IS an interesting question. The assumption that they are mythical is a great leap however. Im sure the data exists on the long term relationships among homosexuals.

My guess is that LTRs among homosexuals is probably significantly lower than heterosexuals given the lack of children. Children tend to result in expectation of LTR's I would also speculate that within the homosexual group LTR's are probably more prevalent in lesbians than male homosexuals. This is, however, purely speculation only slightly more valid than your " mythical" assertion.
112 posted on 02/06/2004 12:25:22 PM PST by tcuoohjohn (Follow The Money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: tcuoohjohn
Yes maam. Sir.
113 posted on 02/06/2004 1:02:50 PM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: tcuoohjohn
Sorry, bud. You don't know me, and you can't generalize like that. I used to be a daily marijuana and hashish smoker too, as well as cigarette smoker. You couldn't PAY me to smoke anything now. I mentioned that about 20 years ago I smoked some weed - and lo and behold, I wasn't tempted into smoking it any more. I didn't have to force myself to keep from slipping into my old habit of smoking weed continually on a daily basis. And the weed was available. What happened? I changed, I lost my desire for it. I didn't want it any more. I changed from a constant drug user to someone who doesn't even want it any more. Someone could dangle the substances I formerly used to excess, and without any restraint or control, in front of me and I would have no trouble saying, "No thanks."

So you're trying to say that unless I smoke a LITTLE or drink a LITTLE I'm still an alcoholic or drug user. And I refute that ignorant and illogical assumption.

Your argument is like saying that a person who used to be unfaithful to his wife, then had a change of heart and now is loyal and faithful, in order to prove he's really reformed, has to hang out with other women to prove he can control himself? Or make out with them and not screw them to show he's really reformed?

For some reason you are trying to twist logic into a pretzel in your attempt to prove that homosexuals can't change. It's a flimsy, failed attempt at that.
114 posted on 02/06/2004 3:42:11 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
I figure if I was able to change, ANYONE can!
115 posted on 02/06/2004 3:42:47 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Good for you!
116 posted on 02/09/2004 12:07:41 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson