[CyberAnt]

You're arguing semantics .. and saying the statement from Wolfson doesn't hold water because it doesn't fit with your opinion of why the dems are bringing up this issue.

And .. you didn't hear what Wolfson said (because McAwful did not say that). McAwful said that Bush was AWOL. Wolfson said something else. Wolfson may have said the carrier video was the issue .. when it really wasn't. But that doesn't deny that Wolfson said what he did.

I realize it may be a smokescreen .. but I do believe the dems are really worried about that video. I remember all the hoopla over it initially and McAwful's statement to the RNC that it could not be allowed in Bush's campaign .. and this was way before Kerry was a potential candidate.

[Mike Darancette]

...and saying the statement from Wolfson doesn't hold water because it doesn't fit with your opinion of why the dems are bringing up this issue.

Watch and see (I've bookmarked this) Kerry will reprise his 1992 statement about what happened during Viet Nam times should not be a political football.

As to whether Wolfson's statement holds water is not something that can not be easily proved or disproved. They had to have a reason and this was as good as any, IMHO.

[Mike Darancette]

And .. you didn't hear what Wolfson said (because McAwful did not say that).

I didn't hear Wolfson say anything about the carrier incident but I did hear McAliff say it. But it just doesn't ring true coming when it did.

[Valin]

but I do believe the dems are really worried about that video.

Can you blame them?