Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt
You don't have to believe me,

Oh, I heard it too, from McAliff no less. But the reason stated does not hold water, a debate on the Carrier picture will get, well, the carrier picture being broadcast (for free).

The Dems through Kerry surrogates are causing the AWOL furor so that Kerry can come out, himself, and say, "Lets move ahead and not discuss what happened 30 years ago". Kerry has more baggage over Viet Nam than the President.

OBTW: A RAT sockpuppet cannot say anything that I am bound to take at face value.

52 posted on 02/05/2004 11:14:03 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Bush Bot by choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Mike Darancette
You're arguing semantics .. and saying the statement from Wolfson doesn't hold water because it doesn't fit with your opinion of why the dems are bringing up this issue.

And .. you didn't hear what Wolfson said (because McAwful did not say that). McAwful said that Bush was AWOL. Wolfson said something else. Wolfson may have said the carrier video was the issue .. when it really wasn't. But that doesn't deny that Wolfson said what he did.

I realize it may be a smokescreen .. but I do believe the dems are really worried about that video. I remember all the hoopla over it initially and McAwful's statement to the RNC that it could not be allowed in Bush's campaign .. and this was way before Kerry was a potential candidate.
53 posted on 02/05/2004 11:47:24 AM PST by CyberAnt (The Election in 2004 - it's for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson