“Distortions?” Not at all:
1) have you informed these folks that you consider James Madison and Thomas Jefferson to have been "treasonous?"
”The silence which enveloped the treasonous [Kentucky & Virginia] Resolutions [authored by Thomas Jefferson & James Madison, respectively] after there cowardly anonymous proclamation amply shows the lack of agreement with their destructive tendency.”
167 posted on 02/05/2004 7:51:13 AM MST by justshutupandtakeit
2) that you consider Mr. Jefferson "scum?"
”[Hamilton] had no tendencies toward monarchism or aristocracy those were rank lies spread by the Jefferson/Callender/Bache/Beckley stream of protoRAT scum.”
112 posted on 01/25/2004 12:24:55 AM MST by justshutupandtakeit
3) and that you believe it would be 'constitutional' for a D@mocrat Congress to appoint Hillary Clinton 'Queen of the United States?'
”So, if the Democrats capture both houses of Congress, pass a law (by a veto-proof margin ;>) declaring Hillary ‘Queen for Life,’ and the high court refuses to consider the case, you would insist that the law (and the Clinton monarchy it established ;>) was constitutional?”
1,885 posted on 12/12/2003 3:21:21 PM MST by Who is John Galt?
”Until the Court has ruled on a law it is constitutional by default whether you or I like it or not.”
1,898 posted on 12/12/2003 11:23:53 PM MST by justshutupandtakeit
(Now it may be news to you, sport, but the United States Constitution makes no provision for the establishment of a Clinton monarchy – with or without ‘high court approval’... ;>)
The way you shoot off your mouth, you really should be prepared to deal with the consequences...
;>)