Sorry, but I’m interested in documented, historical facts – not your ignorant ‘beliefs’...
And the actions of Jefferson/Beckley/Callender/Bache against the Washington administration were the actions of scum.
Congratulations! You ‘believe’ that the author of the Declaration of Independence was “scum.” How nice! (And thanks for proving my point... ;>)
Only the Supreme Court can declare something unconstitutional not justshutupandtakeit nor Who is John Galt. Like it or not.
Sorry, sport, but by your standard, a D@mocrat Congress could pass a law requiring the execution of every Republican in the country, and you would claim it was “constitutional by default.” No offense intended, but you’re a complete idiot...
Do you have anything to add to this discussion or are you just limiting yourself to violating the forum rules?
Ouch! Which rule do you believe I violated? The ‘mysterious & invisible rule against quoting posts?’ (I can provide links if you need them - or is that 'against the rules,' too? ;>)
I am always ready to deal with consequences of my actions though I do prefer dealing with honest men.
ROTFLMAO! Actually, it would appear that you prefer "dealing with" anyone you can intimidate with your ignorant, obnoxious bluster.
Better luck next time...
;>)
That is certainly the now common claim, but it will not hold. For as the Texas sodomy ruling, and rulings like roe v wade, the connecticut condom ruling and such ... it makes the Supreme Court mightier and sovereign than the other four branches, The four branches are the Federal Executive, the Federal Legislative, the States by consentinng legislative decrees, and the People, assembled.
At the current state, the States or People could pass a marriage amendment and the Supreme Court could ruin it, directly or indirectly, say by fiat, defining strangely the terms man and woman for the purposes of legal marriage, or by declaring it's process invalid against some infinite array of arcane details of process.
The Court rules by fiat.
And there's that word again "FIAT".
You slight gold too much. Gold is immune to any "fiat" declarations, Honest and humble, is its whole intrinsic nature. Beautiful and uncommon, too.
Both fiats are ships headed to the breakers of a rocky northen coast, the wind behind them and the tillers wrecked. .
That is certainly the now common claim, but it will not hold. For as the Texas sodomy ruling, and rulings like roe v wade, the connecticut condom ruling and such ... it makes the Supreme Court mightier and sovereign than the other four branches, The four branches are the Federal Executive, the Federal Legislative, the States by consentinng legislative decrees, and the People, assembled.
At the current state, the States or People could pass a marriage amendment and the Supreme Court could ruin it, directly or indirectly, say by fiat, defining strangely the terms man and woman for the purposes of legal marriage, or by declaring it's process invalid against some infinite array of arcane details of process.
The Court rules by fiat.
And there's that word again "FIAT".
You slight gold too much. Gold is immune to any "fiat" declarations, Honest and humble, is its whole intrinsic nature. Beautiful and uncommon, too.
Both fiats are ships headed to the breakers of a rocky northen coast, the wind behind them and the tillers wrecked. .