Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts Worry Terrorists Have Nuke Plans
AP via Yahoo ^ | Wed, Feb 04, 2004 | BURT HERMAN

Posted on 02/04/2004 9:34:42 AM PST by MizSterious

Experts Worry Terrorists Have Nuke Plans
AP

By BURT HERMAN, Associated Press Writer

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - The nuclear black market that let Iran, Libya and North Korea (news - web sites) acquire weapons technology from Pakistan under the noses of international monitors raises suspicions that terror groups also acquired bomb components or plans, experts told The Associated Press.

Al-Qaida apparently has shown interest in acquiring nuclear technology. Two Pakistani nuclear scientists were detained in late 2001 after meeting Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) in Afghanistan (news - web sites) on suspicion of giving away secrets, but they were later released without being charged. The military, which controlled the weapons program, also is known to have elements who sympathize with the Taliban and bin Laden.

Pakistan has for years denied spreading nuclear technology and claimed its arsenal was safe from extremists. But strong international pressure after Iranian revelations to the U.N. nuclear watchdog forced Islamabad to begin an investigation of its weapons program in November. It admitted last month for the first time that scientists had leaked technology.

Officials say Abdul Qadeer Khan — the father of Pakistan's nuclear program — has confessed to selling equipment related to centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons, to Iran, Libya and North Korea. Libya also received designs for a nuclear bomb from Pakistan that it handed over to U.S. and British intelligence last month, European diplomats say.

Khan, however, has denied making a confession, according to the leading Islamic party, Jamaat-e-Islami.

Pakistan itself relied on international black market supplies for the equipment used in its nuclear weapons program that started in the 1970s.

"If the black market could transfer technology from Europe to Pakistan in spite of all these sanctions and embargoes, that same black market of smugglers can also pass on materials from this lab to terrorist groups," said A.H. Nayyar, a nuclear physicist and head of the Pakistan Peace Coalition. "The possibility exists and needs to be investigated thoroughly."

Military spokesman Maj. Gen. Shaukat Sultan on Tuesday denied that Pakistani nuclear technology had fallen into terrorist hands. "It's absolutely negative, there is no truth in it," he said.

The government also has denied official complicity in giving away technology, but a friend of Khan's told the AP that top army officials, including now-President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, were "aware of everything."

White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the Bush administration accepted Musharraf's assurances that the Pakistani government was "not involved in any kind of proliferation."

Musharraf has said the scientists were given wide latitude to develop the nuclear program and worked in secret even from top officials. That secrecy also has raised fears that nuclear workers may have transferred technology or equipment to terrorists, either for money or ideological sympathy.

Experts say centrifuge technology wouldn't be of much use to terror groups, who probably couldn't set up the vast facilities required to enrich useful quantities of uranium, with hundreds of technicians needed to run thousands of centrifuges.

"It's hard enough for countries to do," said Gary Samore, a nonproliferation expert at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies.

The acquisition of weapons designs, however, would make it far easier for terrorists to make a workable bomb, said David Albright, head of the Institute for Science and International Security in Washington.

And if a terror group was able to obtain highly enriched uranium — anywhere from about 110 to 220 pounds — it could possibly build a bomb similar in design to that used on Hiroshima, Japan, at the end of World War II, experts said.

"It's not something that you or I could do in our backyards, but it's relatively easy," Samore said.

Pakistan is estimated to have produced more than 1,540 pounds of highly enriched uranium, but no official figures have ever been released.

"It is very important that all the material that has been produced is accounted for to the last gram," said Nayyar. "If it is not done, then the doubt remains."

Sultan, the military spokesman, declined to comment on whether Khan's alleged confession mentioned highly enriched uranium and potential leaks of it outside Pakistan.

The strongest known link between Pakistani scientists and terrorists were the 2001 arrests Sultan Bashir-ud-Din Mahmood and Abdul Majid, who worked for Pakistan's Atomic Energy Commission until retiring in 1999. The commission, together with Khan's lab worked on the nuclear weapons program.

Mahmood's son told the AP in December 2002 that his father — a deeply conservative Muslim who sympathized with the Taliban — met bin Laden several times between 2000 and July 2001 and the al-Qaida leader asked how to make nuclear bombs. Mahmood claimed to have rebuffed the request, telling bin Laden "it is not child's play for you to build a nuclear bomb," according to his son, who didn't want to be named.

The scientists were cleared of all charges and released in December 2001.

"Pakistani scientists were active there (in Afghanistan) — we never got to the bottom of it," said Albright, also a former Iraq (news - web sites) nuclear weapons inspector.

In light of recent news, the years of Pakistani denials ring especially hollow, Albright said, hoping international pressure would finally make Pakistan come clean.

"There's a lot of smoke and mirrors that the government is throwing up, but at the same time it's being forced to reveal information," he said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abdulqadeerkhan; alqaeda; alqaedanukes; kerry; nukes; pakistan; terrorists

1 posted on 02/04/2004 9:34:43 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
This story can't be true.
John Kerry told me that the terrorist threat is exaggerated.
2 posted on 02/04/2004 9:36:04 AM PST by Gerasimov (My last tag line sucked, so now I have this one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gerasimov
Hey, the "expert" Kerry said different.
3 posted on 02/04/2004 9:38:32 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gerasimov
Kerry is aiding the enemy by making sound bites to get ahead
.............reprehensible!!
4 posted on 02/04/2004 9:39:46 AM PST by international american (Support our troops..............................................revoke Hillary's visa!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I wonder why Pakistan has been so forthcoming in their information. Could it be that this administration means what it says? Or do you think that the bad guys are afraid that a dem could win back the Whitehouse (not!)?

Lando

5 posted on 02/04/2004 9:40:58 AM PST by Lando Lincoln (GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
And the Pakistanis are very concered about it (not!). See Pardon for scientist who sold atom bomb secrets .
6 posted on 02/04/2004 9:41:43 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Perhaps forthcoming with information. But it appears a pardon is in the works for the main proliferator.

7 posted on 02/04/2004 9:42:56 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gerasimov
This story can't be true.
John Kerry told me that the terrorist threat is exaggerated.

My exact thought ... BTTT

8 posted on 02/04/2004 9:43:57 AM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Maybe the message ought to be that ANY state that sells nukes to a terrorist bunch that blows up on American soil will be considered a war time enemy and we will have no choice but to take corresponding measures.

In other words, if we get nuked, so won't you.
9 posted on 02/04/2004 10:21:22 AM PST by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gerasimov
Yup. John Kerry wouldn't lie to us.
10 posted on 02/04/2004 10:25:04 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Kerry Bump. Nukes are an exaggerated threat. Nothing to worry about....
11 posted on 02/04/2004 11:08:37 AM PST by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
... so won't you.

...so will? you.

12 posted on 02/04/2004 11:19:26 AM PST by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson