Posted on 02/04/2004 9:11:45 AM PST by Cicero
OPINION | ||||
Published February 3, 2004 | ||||
Japan just can't switch to gold - yet
WHETHER a studied statement, an off-the cuff comment or a veiled threat, Japanese Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki's suggestion last week that Japan could diversify part of its huge foreign exchange reserves into gold has had international reverberations.
It has brought home once more the fact that the vast dollar reserves which Japan and the rest of Asia hold are a Sword of Damocles for the dollar and the US Treasury market. The impact of such a move on the dollar would be severe. And as Japan has a third of total US Treasury securities held outside the US, the impact on the bond market would also be severe. Mr Tanigaki's statement (in answer to a question in Parliament) that he felt it necessary to take a view on the future composition of Japan's foreign exchange reserves (the bulk of which are in dollars), and that this might include a review of gold holdings, comes at a time when other Asian nations have been expressing concern about their vulnerability to the dollar. It also occurs when Asian central banks (the People's Bank of China for one, an informed source told BT) are expressing strong interest in gold. Asian monetary authorities are working too on laying the foundations for an Asian Bond Market which would provide the infrastructure through which the region could reduce its dependence on the dollar and the US Treasury market, and provide a means for the region to deploy its own savings without channelling them offshore.
Mr Tanigaki's comments were thus timely even if, as a senior Japanese Ministry of Finance official claimed to this correspondent, it would be wrong to infer any immediate action on Japan's part. There is, in fact, a powerful argument why Japan cannot move out of dollars for the time being. This is because it needs to buy dollars, rather than sell them, so long as it pursues its current policy of also buying economic recovery through exports. The MOF spent a record 20 trillion yen (S$321 billion) last year in propping up the dollar against the yen and in the first month of 2004 alone it has spent an incredible seven trillion yen more. The dollars it acquires are then invested back into securities of the dangerously indebted US government. This is an absurd situation, rather like a shopkeeper lending ever larger amounts of money to an important customer who is also a profligate spender, so that he can maintain consumption. The customer signs ever-increasing amounts of IOUs or bills and the shopkeeper has decreasing faith in these. But he cannot sell them so long as he retains his dependence on keeping the customer happy. It is a delicate and dangerous balancing act, and one might wonder why a Japanese finance minister should risk upsetting it, as Mr Tanigaki did. It may have been pure naivety. But it would be dangerous to bank on it. This is not the first time that Japan has issued veiled threats to the US that it is capable of retaliating if the exchange rate weapon is deployed (as Treasury Secretary John Snow appears to be doing now through his policy of benign neglect for the dollar). There was an occasion in 1996 when former Japanese prime minister Ryutaro Hashimoto pondered out loud during a visit to New York about what might happen if Japan were to reduce its (even then) large holdings of US dollar securities. Washington appeared to get the message and the severe upward pressure that the yen had been subjected to eased off. Mr Tanigaki, according to some schools of thought, may have been issuing a similar veiled threat ahead of this week's G7 finance ministers' meeting in Florida. Alternatively, the minister may have been floating a trial balloon to see what impact it would have on the gold, foreign exchange and US Treasury bond markets. As it happened, very little, even though as UBS commented, Mr Tanigaki's remarks may be the biggest story in the official gold sector for many years. The dollar paid more attention to hints by the US Federal Reserve that it could raise interest rates sooner rather than later. The Treasury bond market also seemed too preoccupied with domestic events to notice the remarks. The fact is, however, that at some time the threat of Asian governments running down their colossal dollar holdings (which constitute the bulk of the US$1.9 trillion of official foreign exchange reserves held in Asia) is going to crystallise. It could happen if Japan's economy is moving, as some economists suggest, beyond total export dependence towards a broader-based domestic recovery. Or it could happen if rising US interest rates stall growth and demand for imports. But happen it surely will and reshaping the dangerous structure of mutual dependence between East Asia and the US should be top of the agenda for the G7. The writer is BT's Tokyo correspondent |
The third major player in this economic struggle, Europe, also has a stake in the dollar/yen relationship, and recent news stories suggest that the Euroswine are leaning hard on Japan for interfering with the dollar/Euro exchange rate.
Thus far I agree...;^)
Trading in and out of a primary bull market is the chief reason that there are no customers' yachts.
IMHO.
Just arrived home from an overnight trip to Philadelphia, and no real contact with news or the internet (sometimes little inconveniences can actually turn out to be favors in disguise. Its amazing how much peace of mind one can enjoy during a time of temporary ignorance of the worlds shenanigans .... :)
I just now read the official communiqué issued at the conclusion of the G7 meeting today. I interpret their will allow more flexibility' [for the US$] phrase as an agreement to allow the dollars exchange value to continue to decline, and at least a verbal commitment not to offset its decline with (anyones -- US, French, British, Canadian, German, Japanese, Italian) government intervention.
Man, are we selling our souls to the devil. So that we can continue to enjoy the good life without earning that privilege, and without concerning ourselves with the unpleasant responsibility of paying for it.
We are performing all manner of economic (although they really bear no resemblance to the laws of pure economics) gymnastics for two insidious purposes: to make it appear as though we are not (1) spending ourselves into oblivion, and (2) losing meaningful (to the survival of a free society) jobs/manufacturing hand over fist.
We are using semantics in order to cook the books regarding our employment situation (with economic magic tricks like coining new terms such as exhaustees to describe the hundreds of thousands of people who are no longer a part of the unemployment equation because they have exhausted their unemployment compensation and are still without work. How many of us are aware that the number of exhaustees is currently at a thirty-year high and that, over the next six months, it is projected that two million more Americans will join those sad ranks?
These millions of people (as well as recent high school and college graduates who have yet to find work) are no longer counted among the unemployed. They have been declared statistically invisible so as to allow our leadership to perpetuate the myth of economic recovery. When I took Probability and Statistics, as I recall, the more pertinent variables one left out of the calculations, the less reliable the result. I wonder if government jobs/employment statisticians missed that particular class?
(Do you remember Barry McGuires Eve of Destruction? Every time I read a news release exalting the continuing economic recovery, that dang song begins running through my head with slightly altered words, but an eerily similar connotation.)
We are also allowing our monetary system to disintegrate before our eyes so as to mask our obscene (im)balance of trade and national debt.
I am sure I sound like a broken record (feel free to turn me off at any time :), but I cannot comprehend how rational Americans do not realize that these acts of fiscal prestidigitation cannot continue forever.
There will come a day when foreign investors, who for the first time in our history own the bulk of our dollar reserves/treasuries, decide that they are no longer going to gamble on the paper of a nation that exhibits no fiscal restraint, and no genuine interest in retaining, let alone increasing, its industrial base.
This G7 meeting simply verified that we have our economic neck neatly placed in the guillotine chopping block and nations that dont give a damn about our physical or economic security are the only ones who have access to the rope. That our leaders could have allowed (even prescribed) us to find ourselves in this position is unconscionable.
I suspect that gold (copper/silver) will rally strongly this week and, with the inevitable pullbacks, for the foreseeable future.
Investment-wise, I have never felt queasy about the nature of the stocks or tangibles that I invest in. But lately my portfolio has become so defensive that I almost feel guilty about seeking to profit (or at least retain my savings) from what I see as impending (over the next few months or years) economic and geopolitical catastrophe. In the past, I used to have my portfolio diversified among twelve or fifteen stocks. Today I have the bulk of my portfolio in physical gold and silver, gold and copper miners, a manufacturer of rapid deployment chemical/biological shelters and decontamination systems, a mine/HAZMAT/public safety equipment company, and an oil and natural gas company. Nothing else. I dont trust anything else. Not now. And not for the foreseeable future.
Time to stop rambling (it appears that I set a record tonight) and start running .... :) <= at least give me partial upbeat credit for that, okay?
~ joanie
P.S. Your Ayn Rand quote on the No to Judaization of Jerusalem thread is exquisite. We are indeed allowing capitalism (and the natural actions of a free market/adherence to the law of supply and demand/fiscal responsibility that it requires to flourish) to perish by silent default.
For the United States, Snow gave credit to a new round of tax cuts that President Bush pushed through Congress last summer, which Snow said had helped put the United States "on a path to sustained economic growth."
You don't seem to believe Bush or Snow. I don't either. Bush has also pledged to cut the deficit in half over the next 5 years, and then writes a budget that increases this year's deficit to 520 billion. He thinks we're all imbeciles. He's mostly right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.