To: kattracks
As part of its assessed contribution to the U.N. budget, the United States will supply 22 percent of that repayment figure - $265 million on the principal alone.
good grief...get out..get out now.
2 posted on
02/03/2004 10:41:06 PM PST by
stylin19a
(Is it vietnam yet ?)
To: stylin19a
While I detest the U.N., as long as it is seen by some to be a legitimate organization, getting out would be a bad idea. As long as we're there and hold a seat on the Security Council, we can veto any B.S. that they try to slip through. I can just imagine what the U.N. would try to do without the U.S. creating international gridlock.
Besides, a large amount if not all of the money for renovations/construction will probably end up going to U.S. companies and provide jobs to U.S. construction workers.
To: stylin19a
24 posted on
02/04/2004 1:03:59 AM PST by
ppaul
To: stylin19a
The world body must agree to accept the 5.54 percent interest rate. Interest and principal is to be paid off by all member states. Since 'all member states' = mainly USA, when it comes to forking over money, they will be using US taxpayer's money to pay off this 'loan'. Good grief indeed!
I have a better idea. Let's just offer to pay the entire cost for design and construction of a brand new UN building -- as long as it's located in Geneva!!
To: stylin19a; Happy2BMe
BUMPING FOR REFERENCE
188 posted on
02/04/2004 9:48:28 AM PST by
Happy2BMe
(U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson