To: jmstein7
Kerry taking an opt out is hardly "desertion."
To: RoughDobermann
It is as much as "desertion" as what he is accusing Bush of.
7 posted on
02/03/2004 11:53:24 AM PST by
jmstein7
To: RoughDobermann
Neither is GW's missing a physical. What's good for the goose.....
10 posted on
02/03/2004 11:54:36 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: RoughDobermann
No, but it shows that he was more than willing to shirk his duty.
29 posted on
02/03/2004 12:08:00 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: RoughDobermann
Kerry taking an opt out is hardly "desertion." Agreed. In fact, one could say that Bush's arrangement with the National Guard was no worse than Kerry's arrangement. Yet Kerry's camp is throwing around the "desertion" accusation against Bush.
65 posted on
02/03/2004 12:37:48 PM PST by
alnick
(A vote for anyone but George W. Bush for president in 2004 is a vote to strengthen Al Qaeda.)
To: RoughDobermann
Kerry taking an opt out is hardly "desertion."
I agree. But it what Kerry is encouraging journalists to call "desertion" when the show is on the other foot. And talk about preferential treatment: How does one even get a purple heart for a boo-boo? I've heard the details for the thir purple heart bordered on ridiculous.
72 posted on
02/03/2004 12:39:46 PM PST by
dangus
To: RoughDobermann
When did he know about the "thrice" out and when did he ask for it?
To: RoughDobermann
"Kerry taking an opt out is hardly 'desertion.'"
No $h!t. We ALL wanted early outs.
To: RoughDobermann
Kerry taking an opt out is hardly "desertion."I agree, I don't want to play on that field.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson