Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Calpernia
Standoff Armour to defeat shaped charge warheads is nothing new. It was employed in the last days of WWII.
The problem is that that 18" standoff on each side makes the vehicle 3 feet wider than it was and limits the very mobility the stryker was supposed to supply.

SO9

3 posted on 02/03/2004 8:00:07 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the 9
The Stryker is taller, wider, heavier, and has less protection than the design criteria called for. Other than those "minor" things, it is completely successful.
5 posted on 02/03/2004 8:11:50 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the 9
Standoff Armour to defeat shaped charge warheads is nothing new. It was employed in the last days of WWII. The problem is that that 18" standoff on each side makes the vehicle 3 feet wider than it was and limits the very mobility the stryker was supposed to supply.

That, and the little detail that the PG-7VR tandem warhead rocket that can be used with any RPG launcher can penetrate in excess of ¾ of a meter of armor, about 24-28 inches worth.

Ooops.


37 posted on 02/03/2004 5:51:57 PM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson