Is it somehow your belief that a bullet deflecting off the limb of an oak tree requires "magic"? Fascinating.
No, the 'magic' involved is in your insistance that this is where the 'curb' bullet came from. One of the three shots hit the curb way down by the underpass. - Which one?
Give it up ichy..
-- Why is it so important to you to prove that Oswald was alone?
It's not, nor have I even attempted to "prove" that in this thread.
Lie.. -- You bet me a thousand dollars you could prove portions of Spectors lone gunman theory. [see 'bold' below.
Instead, it is important to me to point out when other people are spouting nonsense. That's because I care about that "truth" thing that I'm sure you've heard about in passing. I expect liberals to be dishonest and addle-brained. I expect more from people on a conservative forum. Usually I am not disappointed, but sometimes I am. But I refuse to allow the facts of various issues to get muddied up by completely untrue nonsense. *That* is what's "so important" to me.
Now then, have you donated that thousand dollars to FreeRepublic yet?
Actually 'ichy', seeing you were unable to prove your theory, you owe FR.. Big time.
The first one, for reasons I've already given and which you have failed to even attempt to rebut -- or even actually disagree with, other than issuing gradeschool taunts.
[It's not, nor have I even attempted to "prove" that ["that Oswald was alone"] in this thread. ]
Lie..
Accuse me of lying one more time without cause, and we'll take this to the moderators. I suggest you reign yourself in a bit.
-- You bet me a thousand dollars you could prove portions of Spectors lone gunman theory.
Are you truly unable to grasp that our making a bet over *one* point in the Warren Commission's scenario is not synonymous with necessarily arguing for *all* of them? Get a grip.
Nice try, but what I actually specifically bet you on was whether you were blowing smoke when you claimed that "no one has ever duplicated such a scenario" -- the "scenario" being hitting 2 out of 3 shots on a moving target at speeds and angles similar to the JFK shooting with a bolt action rifle of the same type.
I offered to bet you on that, you foolishly accepted and named a figure for the bet of $1000, and you lost by being shown that at several times recreations by different groups have *indeed* easily equaled that performance.
You lose, pay up and stop dancing, it not only makes you look silly, it makes you look grossly dishonorable. Don't accept bets you can't win, and if you do, pay up when you lose.
You still owe FreeRepublic that thousand dollars, and I'm not going to let you welsh on it.
Actually 'ichy', seeing you were unable to prove your theory, you owe FR.. Big time.
Dance, dodge, misrepresent... Is this the best you can do?