To: VaBthang4
Also consider the first shot was a hit...the second a complete miss and the third a dead on headshot? Your chronology is wrong. The first shot missed.
Also all three shots would've struck the target if it were not difficult from the AOA employed.
The first shot was deflected by an intervening tree branch.
To: Ichneumon
" The first shot was deflected by an intervening tree branch."
You'll have to prove that one.
240 posted on
02/03/2004 1:25:55 PM PST by
MAWG
To: Ichneumon
And your explanation for the right/frontal shot?
And please if you choose to give me geometry and physics first answer me this: Have you ever shot anyone before?
244 posted on
02/03/2004 1:40:05 PM PST by
VaBthang4
(-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
To: Ichneumon; VaBthang4
VaBthang4 wrote:
-- Also consider the first shot was a hit...the second a complete miss and the third a dead on headshot?
_______________________________________
Your chronology is wrong. The first shot missed.
Also all three shots would've struck the target if it were not difficult from the AOA employed.
The first shot was deflected by an intervening tree branch.
227 -ich-
Ahh yesss.. Your complete supposition that the first shot hit the tree would account for the bullet that struck the curb at the underpass, at what, 200/250 yrds plus downrange?
Quite the ricochet. Another magical moment at Dealy..
The next bullet was even better, according to our expert, Arlen Spector..
Give it up ichy..
-- Why is it so important to you to prove that Oswald was alone?
246 posted on
02/03/2004 1:53:22 PM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33
)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson