Connally admitted not being clear on the sequence, understandable since he went into shock, and said that he relied on his wife's account. Connally's wife was facing forward and had no way of knowing when JFK was first hit relative to her husband. The physical, photographic, and ear/eyewitness accounts trump her presumptions about which shot(s) may have hit JFK -- despite her proximity, she was in a poorer position to view JFK's woundings than other people were.
Of course. There were no reliable witnesses that day were there? lol
No, of course not. How could I have forgotten?
and even the government admitted it wasn't true.
Yes, of course they did, how could I have forgotten?
[The physical, photographic, and ear/eyewitness accounts trump her presumptions about which shot(s) may have hit JFK -- despite her proximity, she was in a poorer position to view JFK's woundings than other people were.]
Of course. There were no reliable witnesses that day were there? lol
Is that what I said? Why no, it isn't, is it?
Misrepresent the evidence if you get your jollies that way, but do *NOT* lie to my face about what I've written, I won't stand for it. Now are you honorable enough to apologize?