Skip to comments.
Ex-Presidents, Johnson Widow Call for JFK Film Probe
AP via TBO ^
| February 2,2004
| Lynn Elber
Posted on 02/02/2004 6:20:27 PM PST by John W
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280, 281-283 next last
To: John W
|
|
This too is Bush's fault. |
241
posted on
02/03/2004 1:27:55 PM PST
by
Fintan
(Someday we'll look back on this moment and plow into a parked car.)
To: spodefly
I think the more likely scenario versus a lone poorly skilled loser is two teams of legitimate shooters. Nobody is gonna try and snipe a moving target without a spotter so I'd have to go with four men minimum.
I havent been to the area so I'd defer to you but if it's two team then they'd be crazy no to biangulate a killbox.
242
posted on
02/03/2004 1:36:28 PM PST
by
VaBthang4
(-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
To: Fintan
Hahaha
243
posted on
02/03/2004 1:37:02 PM PST
by
VaBthang4
(-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
To: Ichneumon
And your explanation for the right/frontal shot?
And please if you choose to give me geometry and physics first answer me this: Have you ever shot anyone before?
244
posted on
02/03/2004 1:40:05 PM PST
by
VaBthang4
(-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
To: MAWG
Ichy, seriously, I'm not ragging on you. If you do have proof that the first shot was deflected, I'd very much like to see it. It could be critically important.
245
posted on
02/03/2004 1:42:58 PM PST
by
MAWG
To: Ichneumon; VaBthang4
VaBthang4 wrote:
-- Also consider the first shot was a hit...the second a complete miss and the third a dead on headshot?
_______________________________________
Your chronology is wrong. The first shot missed.
Also all three shots would've struck the target if it were not difficult from the AOA employed.
The first shot was deflected by an intervening tree branch.
227 -ich-
Ahh yesss.. Your complete supposition that the first shot hit the tree would account for the bullet that struck the curb at the underpass, at what, 200/250 yrds plus downrange?
Quite the ricochet. Another magical moment at Dealy..
The next bullet was even better, according to our expert, Arlen Spector..
Give it up ichy..
-- Why is it so important to you to prove that Oswald was alone?
246
posted on
02/03/2004 1:53:22 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33
)
To: Ichneumon
247
posted on
02/03/2004 2:03:18 PM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Lunatic Fringe; John W; All
248
posted on
02/03/2004 2:06:28 PM PST
by
moonhawk
(Let the beatings begin...)
To: FreedomCalls
Check my post #248.
I think you'll find it interesting.
249
posted on
02/03/2004 2:10:25 PM PST
by
moonhawk
(Let the beatings begin...)
To: Shooter 2.5
250
posted on
02/03/2004 2:53:16 PM PST
by
Fintan
(Someday we'll look back on this moment and plow into a parked car.)
To: Shooter 2.5; Fintan
I did it.
251
posted on
02/03/2004 3:46:08 PM PST
by
unspun
(The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
To: Shooter 2.5; Fintan
I feel terrible, but it was nice shooting for a three and a half year old, don't you think?
252
posted on
02/03/2004 3:46:42 PM PST
by
unspun
(The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
To: unspun
I did it. I feel terrible, but it was nice shooting for a three and a half year old, don't you think? That's no stranger than most conspiracy theories, and even more plausible than many of them. So tell me, do you have earlobes?
To: Ichneumon
I've had them removed, for my autopsy pic's.
254
posted on
02/03/2004 3:59:43 PM PST
by
unspun
(The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
...the bullet hung in mid-air for almost 2 seconds between Kennedy and Connally. The bullet was slowed down so much passing through Kennedy that it took two seconds to catch up with Connally (remember the car was moving). The miracle was that a bullet moving that slowly could do any damage after catching up. I'll bet that I could sell that to the bunch of clowns that comprised, or compromised, the Warren commission.
To: #3Fan
You're looking at pictures of Tippit's skull. The earlier photo on this thread was of a group of photos that are of Tippit. That's why Tippit was killed, he had the same facial structure as Kennedy and when trimmed up looked a lot like Kennedy. The only problem was that Tippit had earlobes, Kennedy didn't. Read the X-Ray reports dictated by radiologists at George Washington University Medical Center and The Hospital of the Good Samaritan in Los Angeles by following the links I posted.
Both reports state that the X-Rays were taken at "US Naval Hospital, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland on September 22, 1963".
I, myself, am a radiologist and those X-Ray reports describe what I can see with my own eyes on those X-rays I posted.
You are asking us to believe that a Dallas Police Officer was murdered by the U.S. Government and that his body was taken to Bethesda Naval Hospital where an autopsy was performed on it without any Navy Medical Officer or Corpsman noticing that the body was not that of JFK. You also want us to believe that the widow Tippit buried her husbands body without realizing that it was not his body.
So, the U.S. Government, the U.S. Navy and Tippitt's own widow were involved in this fantastic conspiracy of yours.
I'm not a Kennedy assasination buff. I am just commenting on the radiology aspect that is right in front of me.
In order to tell me that what I am seeing with my own eyes and what two radiologists from renowned medical centers saw with their own eyes you are proposing a scenario that is as sick as it is implausible.
And, no, J.D. Tippit does not look like JFK.
To: Ichneumon
So tell me, do you have earlobes?Is it still your contention that Kennedy had full-fledged earlobes? Anyone who watches old video of him will plainly see that he definitely does not.
257
posted on
02/03/2004 5:20:52 PM PST
by
#3Fan
To: Polybius
September 22, 1963?
258
posted on
02/03/2004 5:26:12 PM PST
by
MAWG
To: MAWG
To: Richard Kimball
I think you've summed up this entire
business quite concisely and elegantly.
There is no one that will ever be entirely
satisfied with all the "theories" out there.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280, 281-283 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson