Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Presidents, Johnson Widow Call for JFK Film Probe
AP via TBO ^ | February 2,2004 | Lynn Elber

Posted on 02/02/2004 6:20:27 PM PST by John W

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-283 next last
To: John W

This too is Bush's fault.


241 posted on 02/03/2004 1:27:55 PM PST by Fintan (Someday we'll look back on this moment and plow into a parked car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
I think the more likely scenario versus a lone poorly skilled loser is two teams of legitimate shooters. Nobody is gonna try and snipe a moving target without a spotter so I'd have to go with four men minimum.

I havent been to the area so I'd defer to you but if it's two team then they'd be crazy no to biangulate a killbox.
242 posted on 02/03/2004 1:36:28 PM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Fintan
Hahaha
243 posted on 02/03/2004 1:37:02 PM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
And your explanation for the right/frontal shot?

And please if you choose to give me geometry and physics first answer me this: Have you ever shot anyone before?
244 posted on 02/03/2004 1:40:05 PM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: MAWG
Ichy, seriously, I'm not ragging on you. If you do have proof that the first shot was deflected, I'd very much like to see it. It could be critically important.
245 posted on 02/03/2004 1:42:58 PM PST by MAWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon; VaBthang4
VaBthang4 wrote:

-- Also consider the first shot was a hit...the second a complete miss and the third a dead on headshot?


_______________________________________


Your chronology is wrong. The first shot missed.

Also all three shots would've struck the target if it were not difficult from the AOA employed.

The first shot was deflected by an intervening tree branch.
227 -ich-






Ahh yesss.. Your complete supposition that the first shot hit the tree would account for the bullet that struck the curb at the underpass, at what, 200/250 yrds plus downrange?

Quite the ricochet. Another magical moment at Dealy..
The next bullet was even better, according to our expert, Arlen Spector..

Give it up ichy..
-- Why is it so important to you to prove that Oswald was alone?
246 posted on 02/03/2004 1:53:22 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

247 posted on 02/03/2004 2:03:18 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe; John W; All
FWIW

Here's a link to a Computer Graphics World article about the guy who did a 3D reconstruct of the shooting. It was used by ABC in their recent JFK special.

Its very interesting. Has some stuff on the "magic bullet," and shows a more plausible explanation using technology that was not available at the time.

http://cgw.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=Articles&Subsection=Display&ARTICLE_ID=196319
248 posted on 02/03/2004 2:06:28 PM PST by moonhawk (Let the beatings begin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Check my post #248.

I think you'll find it interesting.
249 posted on 02/03/2004 2:10:25 PM PST by moonhawk (Let the beatings begin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5


250 posted on 02/03/2004 2:53:16 PM PST by Fintan (Someday we'll look back on this moment and plow into a parked car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5; Fintan
I did it.
251 posted on 02/03/2004 3:46:08 PM PST by unspun (The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5; Fintan
I feel terrible, but it was nice shooting for a three and a half year old, don't you think?
252 posted on 02/03/2004 3:46:42 PM PST by unspun (The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: unspun
I did it. I feel terrible, but it was nice shooting for a three and a half year old, don't you think?

That's no stranger than most conspiracy theories, and even more plausible than many of them. So tell me, do you have earlobes?

253 posted on 02/03/2004 3:51:36 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
I've had them removed, for my autopsy pic's.
254 posted on 02/03/2004 3:59:43 PM PST by unspun (The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
...the bullet hung in mid-air for almost 2 seconds between Kennedy and Connally.

The bullet was slowed down so much passing through Kennedy that it took two seconds to catch up with Connally (remember the car was moving). The miracle was that a bullet moving that slowly could do any damage after catching up. I'll bet that I could sell that to the bunch of clowns that comprised, or compromised, the Warren commission.

255 posted on 02/03/2004 4:09:27 PM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
You're looking at pictures of Tippit's skull. The earlier photo on this thread was of a group of photos that are of Tippit. That's why Tippit was killed, he had the same facial structure as Kennedy and when trimmed up looked a lot like Kennedy. The only problem was that Tippit had earlobes, Kennedy didn't.

Read the X-Ray reports dictated by radiologists at George Washington University Medical Center and The Hospital of the Good Samaritan in Los Angeles by following the links I posted.

Both reports state that the X-Rays were taken at "US Naval Hospital, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland on September 22, 1963".

I, myself, am a radiologist and those X-Ray reports describe what I can see with my own eyes on those X-rays I posted.

You are asking us to believe that a Dallas Police Officer was murdered by the U.S. Government and that his body was taken to Bethesda Naval Hospital where an autopsy was performed on it without any Navy Medical Officer or Corpsman noticing that the body was not that of JFK. You also want us to believe that the widow Tippit buried her husbands body without realizing that it was not his body.

So, the U.S. Government, the U.S. Navy and Tippitt's own widow were involved in this fantastic conspiracy of yours.

I'm not a Kennedy assasination buff. I am just commenting on the radiology aspect that is right in front of me.

In order to tell me that what I am seeing with my own eyes and what two radiologists from renowned medical centers saw with their own eyes you are proposing a scenario that is as sick as it is implausible.

And, no, J.D. Tippit does not look like JFK.


256 posted on 02/03/2004 4:40:45 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
So tell me, do you have earlobes?

Is it still your contention that Kennedy had full-fledged earlobes? Anyone who watches old video of him will plainly see that he definitely does not.

257 posted on 02/03/2004 5:20:52 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
September 22, 1963?
258 posted on 02/03/2004 5:26:12 PM PST by MAWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: MAWG
September 22, 1963?

Sorry.

Typo.

November vice Spetember.

An attempted anteroposterior projection of a skull identified as: 21296 (numbers upside down) US Naval Hospital NNMC Bethesda Maryland 11 22 63

259 posted on 02/03/2004 5:33:39 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
I think you've summed up this entire
business quite concisely and elegantly.
There is no one that will ever be entirely
satisfied with all the "theories" out there.
260 posted on 02/03/2004 5:37:02 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson