Skip to comments.
Border Patrol catches, then releases, illegals
USA Today ^
| 02/02/2004
| Kevin Johnson
Posted on 02/02/2004 9:09:37 AM PST by Marine Inspector
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:41:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: boris
The taunting is all being done by the cowardly moron who keeps pinging somebody a MONTH after the conversation ended but doesn't have the intelligence or courage to stay and discuss it.
GO AWAY LYING COWARD!
21
posted on
02/02/2004 10:27:20 AM PST
by
discostu
(are you in the pocket of the moment)
To: Marine Inspector
pathetic, why not just send border patrol home and give them their paychecks to sit there?
22
posted on
02/02/2004 10:54:23 AM PST
by
knak
(wasknaknowknid)
To: Marine Inspector; gubamyster; Pro-Bush; FairOpinion; FITZ; moehoward; Nea Wood; Joe Hadenuf; ...
BumPing!
23
posted on
02/02/2004 11:20:13 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Register Republican and Write-In Tom Tancredo in March)
To: looscnnn
Hopefully.
More likely, they would just get sued.
24
posted on
02/02/2004 11:38:11 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(Why settle for a Lesser Evil? Vote Cthuhlu for President!)
To: Little Ray
"More likely, they would just get sued."
Who would sue? The bad guys would see the constant "training" going on and would not attempt to get in the middle of it. They would move down the line, only to encounter more "training" militias. Eventually they would just stay in their little huts waiting.
25
posted on
02/02/2004 11:56:57 AM PST
by
looscnnn
(Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
To: looscnnn
If the militia caught anybody, the ACLU and various other organizations would be happy to sue on their behalf. And Heaven help 'em if they bold enough to return fire...
26
posted on
02/02/2004 11:58:14 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(Why settle for a Lesser Evil? Vote Cthuhlu for President!)
To: Marine Inspector; keri; international american; Kay Soze; jpsb; Capitalist Eric; hershey; ...
"Thousands of illegal immigrants, mostly from Central and South America, are being released into the USA almost immediately after they are picked up by the Border Patrol as part of a policy that U.S. officials acknowledge represents a significant gap in homeland security. The treatment of illegal immigrants from Mexico has not changed. U.S. Border Patrol agents continue to catch and deport waves of Mexican illegals, who last year accounted for most of the 905,000 people caught sneaking into the USA along the 2,000-mile Southwestern border."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At one point in time within the past decade there was a war over the Mexican-American Border.
Mexico won.
The terms of surrender are being worked out between George Bush and Vincent Fox and are time-sensitive with a release date expected to be mid November, 2004.
The conditions of surrender will be published first in the Mexican media, to be followed by a short announcement from a yet to be determined Vincent Fox-appointed official to advise the former American citizens that there is no calm for alarm - Viva La Mexico!
27
posted on
02/02/2004 12:45:54 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
To: Happy2BMe
Yeah whatever. Here's something that'll bug all you panicy folks: I've lived in a border state for 29 years and can't read a word of that newspaper, I think it might say something about Fox quitting drinking.
28
posted on
02/02/2004 12:53:05 PM PST
by
discostu
(are you in the pocket of the moment)
To: Marine Inspector
It's time to unleash the states. If the feds don't want to do their job, then it's time to allow the states full authority to set and enforce punishments for illegal aliens caught within their borders.
Actually, no, scratch that. The states should just assert that authority regardless, pursuant to the 10th amendment.
29
posted on
02/02/2004 12:53:42 PM PST
by
inquest
(The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
To: Happy2BMe
Hmmm.
Wouldn't say Mexico won. I wouldn't want to occupy them (they'd make Iraq look postively friendly), but offensively, they couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag.
Would say we were unwilling to fight, maybe? Possibly 'cause somebody might say something harsh about us?
For some reason Americans (us) have a pathological need to be liked. We need to get over it.
30
posted on
02/02/2004 12:55:50 PM PST
by
Little Ray
(Why settle for a Lesser Evil? Vote Cthuhlu for President!)
To: inquest
"If the feds don't want to do their job, then it's time to allow the states full authority to set and enforce punishments for illegal aliens caught within their borders."
31
posted on
02/02/2004 1:01:25 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
To: Little Ray
For some reason Americans (us) have a pathological need to be liked. We need to get over it.
There is a group here that don't share that "need to be liked" character trait. Haven't you noticed us yet? "They" sure have. LOL
32
posted on
02/02/2004 1:38:33 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
( Dear Mr. President, Sir, Are you listening to the voters?)
To: Marine Inspector
"Thousands of illegal immigrants, mostly from Central and South America, are being released into the USA almost immediately after they are picked up by the Border Patrol as part of a policy that U.S. officials acknowledge represents a significant gap in homeland security."I know I know Reagan did the same.
But that was PRIOR to 9/11!
All is well... all is great...beep.
33
posted on
02/02/2004 1:42:52 PM PST
by
Kay Soze
("If you act like a liberal to get Democrat votes, you can't do something conservative when you win")
To: Marine Inspector
You do realize that by posting news articles you are helping a ....
never mind!
How about those Patriots?
Did ya see the half time show?
34
posted on
02/02/2004 1:44:18 PM PST
by
Kay Soze
("If you act like a liberal to get Democrat votes, you can't do something conservative when you win")
To: inquest
Actually, no, scratch that. The states should just assert that authority regardless, pursuant to the 10th amendment. Actually I wish Texas would just secede from the union and be done with the whole damn thing. This federal crap just aint workin.
35
posted on
02/02/2004 1:51:36 PM PST
by
unixfox
(Close the borders, problems solved!)
To: unixfox
AMEN TO THAT!
The days of Texas deriving any benifit from being a member state of the United States Of America, Inc. prety much faided away in the early `70's.
36
posted on
02/02/2004 2:06:09 PM PST
by
TLI
(...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
To: looscnnn
Who would sue?
Apparently you weren't paying attention when one of the border states (I think it was Arizona) was sued for not having enough water stations out in the desert for the illegals entering the country via that route?
Rattle your sabers all you want, if you don't fix the courts, you ain't got 'nothin.
37
posted on
02/02/2004 2:09:03 PM PST
by
CMAC51
To: inquest
It's time to unleash the states. The States are the major problem. The States give the aliens sanctuary and welfare which is a major draw for illegal aliens.
No, the States have failed also.
Its time for the People to be unleashed.
Marine Inspector
38
posted on
02/02/2004 2:29:15 PM PST
by
Marine Inspector
(Tancredo for President 2004 / Russell Pearce for Congress 2004)
To: CMAC51
Hey, I like that water station idea. I've been saying before on these threads that the stations should be equipped with a radio transmitter that notifies the Border Patrol whenever someone pushes the button for water. And then it should wait about 10-15 minutes to dispense the water.
39
posted on
02/02/2004 3:16:50 PM PST
by
inquest
(The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
To: Marine Inspector
The States give the aliens sanctuary and welfare which is a major draw for illegal aliens.I think that may partly be because of the legal troubles they'd get from the feds if they tried to discriminate legal from illegal. Crazy as that may sound.
40
posted on
02/02/2004 3:18:31 PM PST
by
inquest
(The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson