Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charley Reese: "My Druthers"
King Features Syndicate ^ | 02-02-04 | Reese, Charley

Posted on 02/02/2004 6:27:27 AM PST by Theodore R.

My Druthers

A rather irate reader of my column has sarcastically suggested in a letter to the editor that since I don't like President George W. Bush, I should tell folks who should replace him.

Well, in the first place, I don't dislike Bush; I think he's a disaster as a president, but as a human being, he appears to be likable.

In the second place, you must understand that I will express my druthers, but that's all they are — druthers, not a prediction. I have no idea who will be the Democrats' nominee, much less how the vote will go in November.

But if I had my druthers, I'd choose Howard Dean as Bush's replacement. Unfortunately, the very qualities that would make him a great president make him a poor candidate in today's hyper-media world. He tells the truth, pleasant or unpleasant; he speaks briefly and bluntly; and he shows his emotions. All of which do not play well on the cool medium of television.

My second druther would be John Edwards. Having served only part of his first-ever term in a political office, he is still enough of an outsider to make some needed reforms. His campaign theme — that there are two Americas, one for the rich and influential and one for the rest of us — is a bull's-eye truth. Behind his boyish grin is a very intelligent, much-disciplined and very ambitious man. Many a corporation paid dearly because big-shot lawyers underestimated him in a courtroom during his trial-lawyer days.

My third druther is — and may my Confederate ancestors forgive me — Sen. John Kerry. He is a somewhat-stuffy rich guy from New England, but he was a rich kid who volunteered and fought hard in the Vietnam War. Then, when he came home, he had the guts to oppose it publicly. I would probably disagree with many of his policies, but I would feel comfortable that he would not stupidly lead us into a disaster.

Joe Lieberman is just another Bush with a different religion. Al Sharpton and Dennis Kucinich are running on ego with no chance of winning and should drop out.

That brings us to my final druther. If the choice in November is between Gen. Wesley Clark and George Bush, I'll vote for Bush. Better an amiable empty-head than a mean-spirited egomaniac of questionable character. Look at Clark's eyes. There is something strange about this guy, and I don't trust him any farther than I could throw my piano. Don't forget, he was fired by the Clinton administration. Don't forget, another retired general took the unprecedented step of saying publicly that he would never vote for Clark for reasons of "character and morals."

Well, as you can see, my first three druthers are all liberals, while I'm a conservative. That's because there are no conservatives in the race. Bush is not a conservative. No conservative would give the middle finger to long-time allies, declare war on the world, run record budget deficits and record trade deficits, fail to secure our borders, offer an incentive for even more illegal immigrants to come in, pour pork into the hands of big corporations and ravage the environment. It's an indicator of how far left the political spectrum has shifted that of all the candidates, Bush included, Dean is the most conservative.

I agree with Oswald Spengler, who wrote "The Decline of the West" in the early part of the last century. We are transitioning from what he called an age of money to the age of Caesars. The old, cherished ideal of minimum government and maximum freedom will not be realized in our or our children's lifetimes. John Adams said the Constitution was written for a moral and virtuous people, and for the most part today, we are neither.

All that is left for us to do is to try to choose a ruler who has brains and a good heart — an Augustus Caesar or a Marcus Aurelius rather than a Nero or a Caligula.

So be careful, voter. Be very careful.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © 2004 by King Features Syndicate, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; charleyreese; clark; conservatives; dean; edwards; iraq; kerry; kucinich; liberalism; lieberman; moraldepravity; oswaldspengler

1 posted on 02/02/2004 6:27:28 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Do you agree with Charley?
2 posted on 02/02/2004 6:36:30 AM PST by EllaMinnow (If you want to send a message, call Western Union.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Sometimes Charley is "spot on", other times......

Unfortunately for President Bush, Charley's sentiments are a lot broader-based than many of us are willing to admit,and I think Mr. Bush may well be a 1 term president.

His "shining moment" as a president came right after 9/11;his very possible downfall was the decision to invade Iraq.

3 posted on 02/02/2004 6:44:10 AM PST by genefromjersey (So little time - so many FLAMES to light !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
I agree with Charley about Wesley Clark!!!!

He does not mention the liberal judges in his presidential-candidate analysis. Dean is now a nonfactor, may not win a single primary to come. Kerry could sweep away the soccer moms. He must be taken seriously. Bush has not impressed many on the left and the right.
4 posted on 02/02/2004 6:44:51 AM PST by Theodore R. (When will they ever learn?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
"while I'm a conservative"

Ha! Good one Charlie. Hey, how's your buddy Arafat doing?

5 posted on 02/02/2004 6:54:14 AM PST by subterfuge (Hitlary's worst nightmare? ..Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
He'd prefer Howard Dean. That's all ya need to know 'bout ol' Charley.

Somebody get the butterfly net and straightjacket. He has a reservation with a nice, padded room.
6 posted on 02/02/2004 6:55:29 AM PST by Little Ray (Why settle for a Lesser Evil? Vote Cthuhlu for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
He says he'd vote for Dean, Edwards or Kerry against President Bush.

Do you agree with tyhat, or only that he would choose GWB over Clark - which is damning with faint praise indeed.
7 posted on 02/02/2004 6:56:56 AM PST by EllaMinnow (If you want to send a message, call Western Union.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Anyone who thinks that Bush has declared war on the world has not demonstrated their conservative credentials.
8 posted on 02/02/2004 7:15:30 AM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains
I know Reese is an idiot, I was just wondering why anyone would think this tripe was worth posting.
9 posted on 02/02/2004 7:19:08 AM PST by EllaMinnow (If you want to send a message, call Western Union.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
About the best I can say for Charley is that he gets one day closer to retirement each day. He has already reached irrelevancy.
10 posted on 02/02/2004 7:24:11 AM PST by CSXT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Joe Lieberman is just another Bush with a different religion

Oh, c'mon just say it...Lieberman is a JEW. JEW JEW JEW. Now that Charlie prays to Mecca each morning, these things are more important to him than before.

11 posted on 02/02/2004 7:28:16 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
Sometimes Charley is "spot on", other times......

Yeah, he's spot on like putting shit through a fan and hitting a dartboard.

12 posted on 02/02/2004 7:29:28 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

13 posted on 02/02/2004 7:30:52 AM PST by MJY1288 (VOTE CONSTITUTION PARTY IF YOU WANT A DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Charley ought to stick to things he knows something about
like the South .
14 posted on 02/02/2004 9:02:34 AM PST by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
I think Charley is a worthless piece of shiite. And that is the nicest thing I have to say of him.
15 posted on 02/02/2004 9:09:17 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson