[Prodigal Son]

Thus, you are wrong.

I don't think so. If my wife doesn't wear her top on the beach, she's doing this for sexual entertainment? Yeah right...

Just like when I take my top off- it's for sexual entertainment. OK.

[smith288]

I don't think so. If my wife doesn't wear her top on the beach, she's doing this for sexual entertainment? Yeah right...

Just like when I take my top off- it's for sexual entertainment. OK. Your wife takes her top off for purposes of not getting lines. Please do tell what Janet was doing in this environment? Could it be to shock? If so then that would blow your argument. It was for shock which means it was not being used for its natural useful purpose of pumping out milk. So you are wrong. Again...Do you have kids?

[Revolting cat!]

Somehow I think that no reaction would have been better than this prudery and overreaction.

But the important question is: what d'ya expect? If he hadn't done it would everything have been okie dokie? You reward, worship these porno no talents, brand everyone who doesn't as "RACIST!", and then you're surprised, people? In the 1950s the America's family were the Nelsons, in the Zeroes (and since the 70s) it seems to be the Jacksons. Helloooooo!

[Thumper1960]

How wouold you react if you and your wie were at the local market and a man decided to rip open her top and expose her breast to an unsuspecting public?

"Awww...there's nothing obscene here....go ahead and rip off her panties, too."

[sfRummygirl]

I got news for ya. Your wife knows damn well what she's doing at the beach when she takes her top off. Sorry, buddy.