Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
I know they said that(it was in the article linked in post #38). But did they say she refused to testify? Did they say why he wasn't charged with assault?

There's also a big question in my mind about their theory about why the judge imposed such a harsh sentence. If the prosecution didn't introduce evidence of assault into evidence - and in fact stipulated that no one was home at the time of the assault - how could the judge consider it when imposing a sentence?

134 posted on 02/07/2004 10:12:18 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: liberallarry
Correction.

"at the time of the assault" should read "at the time of the burglary".

135 posted on 02/07/2004 10:14:09 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: liberallarry
If the prosecution didn't introduce evidence of assault into evidence - and in fact stipulated that no one was home at the time of the assault

Hold it there. You are saying that they said that no one was at home. That is quite different from what the record states. You have to be able to understand the legal jargon though.

According to court records, prosecutors reduced the charge to second-degree burglary because they couldn't prove that Johnson had been home during the theft. "It was, in effect, a stipulation by the state that the house was not actually occupied at the time," states a 1971 state Supreme Court ruling rejecting Allen's appeal.

The "in effect" is very important. In reality, the prosecution said no such thing. They only said they couldn't prove in court that the house was occupied. This is not the same thing as what you said. Not being able to prove something is, is quite different from saying that something is not. Although in the trial portion of a case it can have the same effect. If you can't prove it, you can't bring it up.

The sentencing rules though are a bit less ridged. The judge may consider things that were not brought up in the trial portion. Sentences are generally made harsher or more merciful depending on what mitigating factors are brought up at that point.

138 posted on 02/07/2004 10:44:35 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Don't heat distilled water in the microwave. This has been a public service announcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson