What am I to think of yours?
According to the state Department of Correction's official record of the crime , Johnston County sheriff's deputy J.D. Stewart reported that Johnson was home at the time, and she and Allen scuffled. "She was somewhat injured; bruises and scrapes, but nothing serious," the report states.
We have two records. One made at the time. One long after the fact. Which one should be believed?
That you can't even see the relationship tells me that I prefer not to share the planet with you.
Feel free to leave at any time.
The prosecution was so uncomfortable with the record made at the time that they didn't charge Mr. Allen with assault and stipulated that no one was home at the time of the breakin.
Do you have a problem accepting the state's judgement? If so, tell me why you prefer to believe the trooper rather than the D.A.? And why the State chose to reject the trooper's report?