To: Lord_Baltar
You don't see a difference between a statue with breasts shown and a man walking up to a woman, tearing her top off exposing her breasts?
954 posted on
02/02/2004 7:30:27 AM PST by
GROOVY
To: GROOVY
Good point. I see a "slippery slope" made manifest in Lord B's posts.
To: GROOVY
Look Groovy, again, inspite of the insistence that this was done on purpose, the participants themselves both claim it was an accident.
Oops....
Whether it was or wasn't, who knows.
If he did it on purpose, and Janet Jackson doesn't sue Justin Timberlake into abject poverty, I don't see this as some "Boobgate" kinda crime, OK.
A naked breast, with a pierced style paistie, was visible, from a distance, for a moment or two.
This thread has gone on for nearly 1000 posts, over a single boob.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson