To: GROOVY
Look Groovy, again, inspite of the insistence that this was done on purpose, the participants themselves both claim it was an accident.
Oops....
Whether it was or wasn't, who knows.
If he did it on purpose, and Janet Jackson doesn't sue Justin Timberlake into abject poverty, I don't see this as some "Boobgate" kinda crime, OK.
A naked breast, with a pierced style paistie, was visible, from a distance, for a moment or two.
This thread has gone on for nearly 1000 posts, over a single boob.
To: Lord_Baltar
I don't see this as some "Boobgate" kinda crime, OK This is more important than talking about intentionally leaving the borders open during a war on terror. Treason doesn't jiggle, see?
964 posted on
02/02/2004 7:40:54 AM PST by
Jim Cane
(Vote Tancredo in '04)
To: Lord_Baltar
This thread has gone on for nearly 1000 posts, over a single boob. No, two boobs - Janet's, and you.
That's only 500 posts per boob. :-)
I know that was a cheap shot, but you set yourself up for it royally! ;-)
990 posted on
02/02/2004 8:16:03 AM PST by
Luke Skyfreeper
(For your post: Michael <a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">miserable failure</a> Moore)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson