[kenth]

Part of the reason people continue to argue with you is that you are taking the same stance that CBS, the NFL and MTV are, in that it was merely an accident. This contradicts what people saw. For the three companies that produced the display to lie about it is to play the people for fools. They are trying to downplay their attempt at shock value not by apologizing and taking responsibility, but by deeming the viewers idiots who will believe anything told them.

People tuned in to watch a football game. Some left the station on during halftime. A reasonable expectation exists that certain behaviors won't happen during the halftime of a football game.

An accidental flash from some poor woman is one thing, a man ripping off a womans top on purpose is a behavior that some of us don't want to encourage. Then to be told that we did not see what we personally witnissed is an insult.

[archy]

An accidental flash from some poor woman is one thing, a man ripping off a womans top on purpose is a behavior that some of us don't want to encourage.

Nah. The little slut was asking for it.

[NYCVirago]

Part of the reason people continue to argue with you is that you are taking the same stance that CBS, the NFL and MTV are, in that it was merely an accident. This contradicts what people saw. For the three companies that produced the display to lie about it is to play the people for fools. They are trying to downplay their attempt at shock value not by apologizing and taking responsibility, but by deeming the viewers idiots who will believe anything told them.

Great post! Anybody who believes that exposure was an accident probably also believed Clinton when he said he did not have sexual relations with that woman.