Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kenth
Part of the reason people continue to argue with you is that you are taking the same stance that CBS, the NFL and MTV are, in that it was merely an accident. This contradicts what people saw. For the three companies that produced the display to lie about it is to play the people for fools. They are trying to downplay their attempt at shock value not by apologizing and taking responsibility, but by deeming the viewers idiots who will believe anything told them.

Great post! Anybody who believes that exposure was an accident probably also believed Clinton when he said he did not have sexual relations with that woman.

1,151 posted on 02/02/2004 12:01:41 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1018 | View Replies ]


To: NYCVirago
'Wardrobe malfunction'...
Actually, the breast was supposed to remain covered,
while the rest of her clothes fell off.

1,153 posted on 02/02/2004 12:05:44 PM PST by evets (APPLAUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson