[BARLF]

The Government has seen "categoric" evidence that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, a Cabinet minister has insisted.

Leader of the House of Commons Peter Hain said he and other ministers, including Tony Blair, had seen intelligence showing the ousted dictator had chemical and biological weapons.

He also said weapons inspectors had uncovered evidence of WMD programmes, secret laboratories and "chemical and biological weapons ventures".

What does this mean? Did Kay see this same evidence and deem it not credible?

[FairOpinion]

Maybe Kay didn't see this evidence.

My guess is that Kay was turned loose to find the WMD in Iraq, but was not given access to previous, pre-war intel, nor was he receiving sufficient support -- I read somewhere, that was the real reason he quit.